首页> 外文OA文献 >Can topical insect repellents reduce malaria? A cluster-randomised controlled trial of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR.
【2h】

Can topical insect repellents reduce malaria? A cluster-randomised controlled trial of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR.

机译:外用驱虫剂可以减少疟疾吗?老挝人民民主共和国的驱虫剂N,N-二乙基-间甲苯胺(DEET)的集群随机对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Mosquito vectors of malaria in Southeast Asia readily feed outdoors making malaria control through indoor insecticides such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying more difficult. Topical insect repellents may be able to protect users from outdoor biting, thereby providing additional protection above the current best practice of LLINs.udMethods and Findings: A double blind, household randomised, placebo-controlled trial of insect repellent to reduce malaria was carried out in southern Lao PDR to determine whether the use of repellent and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) could reduce malaria more than LLINs alone. A total of 1,597 households, including 7,979 participants, were recruited in June 2009 and April 2010. Equal group allocation, stratified by village, was used to randomise 795 households to a 15% DEET lotion and the remainder were given a placebo lotion. Participants, field staff and data analysts were blinded to the group assignment until data analysis had been completed. All households received new LLINs. Participants were asked to apply their lotion to exposed skin every evening and sleep under the LLINs each night. Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax cases were actively identified by monthly rapid diagnostic tests. Intention to treat analysis found no effect from the use of repellent on malaria incidence (hazard ratio: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p = 0.868). A higher socio-economic score was found to significantly decrease malaria risk (hazard ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58–0.90, p = 0.004). Women were also found to have a reduced risk of infection (hazard ratio: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.92, p = 0.020). According to protocol analysis which excluded participants using the lotions less than 90% of the time found similar results with no effect from the use of repellent.udConclusions: This randomised controlled trial suggests that topical repellents are not a suitable intervention in addition to LLINs against malaria amongst agricultural populations in southern Lao PDR. These results are also likely to be applicable to much of the Greater Mekong Sub-region.udTrial Registration: This trial is registered with number NCT00938379.
机译:背景:东南亚的疟疾蚊媒很容易在户外觅食,这使得通过室内杀虫剂(例如长效杀虫网(LLIN)和室内残留喷雾剂)控制疟疾更加困难。局部驱虫剂可能能够保护使用者免受户外叮咬,从而提供比当前LLIN最佳实践更好的保护。 ud方法和发现:进行了一项双盲,家庭随机,安慰剂对照的驱虫剂试验,以减少疟疾。在老挝人民民主共和国南部,确定使用驱蚊剂和长效杀虫网(LLIN)是否比单独使用LLIN更能减少疟疾。 2009年6月和2010年4月,共招募了1,597户家庭,其中包括7,979名参与者。按村庄划分的均等分配用于将795户家庭随机分配到15%的DEET乳液中,其余的则给予安慰剂乳液。参与者,现场工作人员和数据分析员对小组分配不知情,直到完成数据分析为止。所有家庭都收到了新的LLIN。要求参与者每天晚上将其乳液涂在裸露的皮肤上,并每晚在LLIN下睡觉。通过每月的快速诊断测试,积极鉴定出恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫病例。治疗意向分析发现使用驱避剂对疟疾发病率没有影响(危险比:1.00,95%CI:0.99-1.01,p = 0.868)。发现较高的社会经济得分可以显着降低疟疾风险(危险比:0.72,95%CI:0.58–0.90,p = 0.004)。还发现妇女感染风险降低(危险比:0.59,95%CI:0.37–0.92,p = 0.020)。根据方案分析,排除参与者使用乳液的时间少于90%的人发现了相似的结果,而使用驱避剂则没有效果。 ud结论:这项随机对照试验表明,除LLINs以外,局部驱避剂不是一种合适的干预措施老挝南部农业人口中的疟疾。这些结果也可能适用于大湄公河次区域的大部分地区。 ud试验注册:该试验的注册号为NCT00938379。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号