首页> 外文OA文献 >Governance and the geography of authority : modalities of authorisation and the transnational governing of climate change.
【2h】

Governance and the geography of authority : modalities of authorisation and the transnational governing of climate change.

机译:治理和权力机构的地理位置:授权的方式和气候变化的跨国治理。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Within debates about the emergence and nature of governance, it has become commonplace to debate the whereabouts and possibilities of authority. Traditionally, authority is conceived as a property of some actor or institution and is regarded as divisible over time and space. Drawing on theories of power, in which it is regarded as constitutive of social relations, this paper proposes an alternative account of authority in which it is seen as one form of power that can be enacted towards three distinct purposes—instrumental (as consent), associational (as consensus), and governmental (as concord)—involving particular forms of recognition and compliance, and mediated through distinct sociospatial relations. The paper examines the potential of such an approach through exploring the workings of authority in transnational climate-change governance. Given the sustained debates within this field concerning the shifting geographies of authority between public/private actors and across different political spaces, this provides an important test of the explanatory value of this approach. The analysis suggests that, while these modes are not mutually exclusive, they orchestrate the ‘will to govern’ in significantly different ways, with important implications both for how governing is accomplished and for the geographies of global environmental governance. udKeywords: governance, authority, power, climate change, transnational networks
机译:在有关治理的出现和性质的辩论中,辩论权威的下落和可能性已变得司空见惯。传统上,权威被认为是某些行为者或机构的财产,被视为在时间和空间上是可分割的。借鉴权力理论,其中权力被视为社会关系的组成部分,本文提出了一种替代性的权力解释,其中权力被视为可以实现三种不同目的的一种权力形式:工具性(同意);协会(作为共识)和政府(作为和谐)—涉及特定形式的承认和遵守,并通过独特的社会空间关系进行调解。本文通过探讨跨国气候变化治理中权威机构的运作,研究了这种方法的潜力。鉴于该领域内有关公共/私人行为者之间以及不同政治空间之间的权威地域转移的争论持续不断,这提供了对该方法的解释价值的重要检验。分析表明,尽管这些模式不是相互排斥的,但它们以截然不同的方式编排“治理意愿”,这对治理的完成方式以及全球环境治理的领域都具有重要意义。 ud关键字:治理,权威,权力,气候变化,跨国网络

著录项

  • 作者

    Bulkeley H.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号