首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring the differences in general practitioner and health care specialist utilization according to education, occupation, income and social networks across Europe : findings from the European social survey (2014)udspecial module on the social determinants of health.
【2h】

Exploring the differences in general practitioner and health care specialist utilization according to education, occupation, income and social networks across Europe : findings from the European social survey (2014)udspecial module on the social determinants of health.

机译:根据欧洲各地的教育,职业,收入和社交网络,探索全科医生和卫生保健专家的使用差异:欧洲社会调查的结果(2014年) ud关于健康的社会决定因素的特别模块。

摘要

Background: Low socioeconomic position (SEP) tends to be linked to higher use of general practitioners (GPs), while the use of health care specialists is more common in higher SEPs. Despite extensive literature in this area, previous studies have, however, only studied health care use by income or education. The aim of this study is, therefore, to examine inequalities in GP and health care specialist use by four social markers that may be linked to health care utilization (educational level, occupational status, level of financial strain and size and frequency of social networks) across 20 European countries and Israel. Methods: Logistic regression models were employed using data from the seventh round of the European Social Survey; this study focused upon people aged 25–75 years, across 21 countries. Health care utilization was measured according to self-reported use of GP or specialist care within 12 months. Analyses tested four social markers: income (financial strain), occupational status, education and social networks. Results: We observed a cross-national tendency that countries with higher or equal probability of GP utilization by lower SEP groups had a more consistent probability of specialist use among high SEP groups. Moreover, countries with inequalities in GP use in favour of high SEP groups had comparable levels of inequalities in specialist care utilization. This was the case for three social markers (education, occupational class and social networks), while the pattern was less pronounced for income (financial strain). Conclusion: There are significant inequalities associated with GP and specialist health care use across Europe—with higher SEP groups more likely to use health care specialists, compared with lower SEP groups. In the context of health care specialist use, education and occupation appear to be particularly important factors.
机译:背景:低社会经济地位(SEP)往往与全科医生(GPs)的使用增加有关,而卫生保健专家的使用在较高SEP中更常见。尽管在该领域有大量文献,但是以前的研究仅按收入或教育程度研究了医疗保健的使用。因此,本研究的目的是通过与卫生保健利用有关的四个社会指标(教育水平,职业状况,财务压力水平以及社交网络的规模和频率)来检验全科医生和卫生保健专家使用方面的不平等现象。遍布20个欧洲国家和以色列。方法:采用来自欧洲社会调查第七轮的数据进行逻辑回归模型;这项研究针对21个国家/地区的25-75岁的人群。根据GP在12个月内自我报告的使用GP或专科护理来衡量医疗保健利用率。分析测试了四个社会指标:收入(财务压力),职业状况,教育和社交网络。结果:我们观察到一种跨国趋势,即较高SEP组中较低SEP组使用GP的可能性较高或相等的国家在使用SEP较高的组中具有较高的专家使用概率。此外,在全科医生使用方面不平等的国家,而那些在标准必要专业人士群体中偏高的国家,在专科护理的使用方面也存在相当程度的不平等。这是三个社会标志(教育,职业阶层和社交网络)的情况,而收入的模式则不太明显(财务压力)。结论:在欧洲,与全科医生和专科医疗保健使用相关的不平等现象显着-与低SEP组相比,较高的SEP组更有可能使用医疗保健专家。在卫生保健专业人员的使用中,教育和职业似乎是特别重要的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号