首页> 外文OA文献 >'Personalised evidence' for personalised healthcare : integration of a clinical librarian into mental health services – a feasibility study.
【2h】

'Personalised evidence' for personalised healthcare : integration of a clinical librarian into mental health services – a feasibility study.

机译:个性化医疗的“个性化证据”:将临床图书馆员整合到心理健康服务中–一项可行性研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aims and method To evaluate the feasibility of integrating a clinical librarian (CL) within four mental health teams. A CL was attached to three clinical teams and the Trustwide Psychology Research and Clinical Governance Structure for 12 months. Requests for evidence syntheses were recorded. The perceived impact of individual evidence summaries on staff activities was evaluated using a brief online questionnaire.udResults Overall, 82 requests for evidence summaries were received: 50% related to evidence for individual patient care, 23% to generic clinical issues and 27% were on management/corporate topics. In the questionnaires 105 participants indicated that the most common impact on their practice was advice given to colleagues (51 respondents), closely followed by the evidence summaries stimulating new ideas for patient care or treatment (50 respondents).udClinical implications The integration of a CL into clinical and corporate teams is feasible and perceived as having an impact on staff activities. A CL may be able to collate ‘personalised evidence’ which may enhance individualised healthcare. In some cases the usual concept of a hierarchy of evidence may not easily apply, with case reports providing guidance which may be more applicable than population-based studies.
机译:目的和方法评估将临床图书馆员(CL)整合到四个精神卫生小组中的可行性。一个CL被附加到三个临床团队和Trustwide心理学研究与临床治理结构中,为期12个月。记录了证据综合请求。使用简短的在线调查问卷评估了个人证据摘要对员工活动的影响。 ud结果总共收到了82份证据摘要请求:50%与个人患者护理相关,23%与一般临床问题相关,27%关于管理/企业主题。在调查问卷中,有105位参与者表示,对他们的行为最普遍的影响是向同事(51位受访者)提供的建议,紧随其后的是证据摘要,这些信息刺激了患者护理或治疗的新想法(50位受访者)。 ud临床意义将CL纳入临床团队和公司团队是可行的,并认为对员工活动有影响。 CL可能能够整理“个性化证据”,从而增强个性化医疗保健。在某些情况下,证据层次结构的通常概念可能不容易应用,案例报告提供的指导可能比基于人口的研究更适用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Steele R.; Tiffin P.A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号