首页> 外文OA文献 >CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF EXISTING RECYCLABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR NEW PRODUCTS IN ORDER TO DEFINE A REFERENCE METHOD
【2h】

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF EXISTING RECYCLABILITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR NEW PRODUCTS IN ORDER TO DEFINE A REFERENCE METHOD

机译:新产品现有回收率评估方法的临界分析,以定义一种引用方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The designers of products subject to the European regulations on waste have an obligation to improve the recyclability of their products from the very first design stages. The statutory texts refer to ISO standard 22 628, which proposes a method to calculate vehicle recyclability. There are several scientific studies that propose other calculation methods as well. Yet the feedback from the CREER club, a group of manufacturers and suppliers expert in ecodesign and recycling, is that the product recyclability calculation method proposed in this standard is not satisfactory, since only a mass indicator is used, the calculation scope is not clearly defined, and common data on the recycling industry does not exist to allow comparable calculations to be made for different products. For these reasons, it is difficult for manufacturers to have access to a method and common data for calculation purposes.A critical analysis of the standard and the various calculation methods identified in scientific journals was performed. An initial discussion brought to light several possible scopes of calculation. Additional indicators, such as quality loss or economic value loss, would be complementary to the mass indicator. Case studies were performed to compare these different methods. A new method and its scope of calculation are proposed in order to develop a reference method.
机译:受欧洲废物法规约束的产品设计者有义务在最初的设计阶段就提高其产品的可回收性。法定文本参考ISO标准22628,该标准提出了一种计算车辆可回收性的方法。有几项科学研究也提出了其他计算方法。然而,来自CREER俱乐部(由生态设计和回收利用的制造商和供应商组成的专家组)的反馈是,此标准中提出的产品可回收性计算方法并不令人满意,因为仅使用了质量指标,因此计算范围不确定,并且不存在有关回收行业的通用数据,因此无法对不同产品进行可比的计算。由于这些原因,制造商很难获得用于计算目的的方法和公共数据。对标准和科学期刊中确定的各种计算方法进行了严格的分析。初步讨论揭示了几种可能的计算范围。诸如质量损失或经济价值损失之类的其他指标将作为质量指标的补充。进行案例研究以比较这些不同的方法。为了发展参考方法,提出了一种新的方法及其计算范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号