首页> 外文OA文献 >Precision and Accuracy: Omnipod Pdm® (O-Pdm) Versus Freestyle Lite Meter® (Fsl Meter) Utilizing Freestyle Lite (Fsl)® Test Strips in Multiple Patient Situations
【2h】

Precision and Accuracy: Omnipod Pdm® (O-Pdm) Versus Freestyle Lite Meter® (Fsl Meter) Utilizing Freestyle Lite (Fsl)® Test Strips in Multiple Patient Situations

机译:精度和准确性:OmnipodPdm®(O-Pdm)与Freestyle LiteMeter®(Fsl Meter)和Freestyle Lite(Fsl)®测试条在多种患者情况下的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Today, diabetes mellitus affects 8.3% of the people in the United States and is having detrimental effects on patient populations as well as health care. To this date, there are numerous monitors that all meet specific requirements and industry standards in order to aid patients in self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). There is currently a large market for these monitors and efforts have been made to devise the monitors to be accurate and precise. Through this study, accuracy and precision were studied by evaluating the difference between the O-PDM and FSL meter monitoring systems. It was hypothesized that a difference in accuracy and precision may or may not occur when scented and unscented lotion residues are placed on the testing sites before glucose readings. By taking glucose readings with lancets at multiple sites using FSL test strips with both O-PDM and FSL meter monitors and then taking readings again once lotion residues were removed with alcohol, data were analyzed to determine if a change was present. It was concluded that changes were apparent when scented lotion and unscented lotion was present on the testing site. In addition, a statistically significant difference was present in the unscented lotions of both the O-PDM and FSL meter groups when compared to their respective controls. The alcohol data showed large differences when compared to the readings taken with lotion present, and the alcohol group presented data that was similar to the control groups. By understanding potential sources of error, such as lotion residues as well as other left over particles, health care professionals, as well as patients may utilize SMBG more effectively. The importance of hand washing as well as cleaning testing sites with alcohol before readings is encouraged for both patients and health care professionals in order that they may identify common errors and work towards improved diabetes care.
机译:如今,糖尿病影响了美国8.3%的人口,并且对患者人群和医疗保健产生不利影响。迄今为止,有许多监视器都满足特定要求和行业标准,以帮助患者自我监测血糖(SMBG)。这些监视器目前有很大的市场,并且已经做出努力以将监视器设计得精确和精确。通过这项研究,通过评估O-PDM和FSL仪表监控系统之间的差异,研究了准确性和精度。假设在葡萄糖读数之前将有气味的和无气味的洗剂残留物放置在测试部位上时,可能会或可能不会出现准确性和精确度的差异。通过使用带有O-PDM和FSL仪表监视器的FSL试纸在多个位置使用刺血针读取葡萄糖读数,然后用酒精去除洗剂残留后再次获取读数,分析数据以确定是否存在变化。得出的结论是,当测试现场有香精乳液和无香精乳液时,变化显而易见。另外,与各自的对照相比,O-PDM和FSL仪表组的无味洗剂中存在统计学上的显着差异。与含洗剂的读数相比,酒精数据显示出很大的差异,酒精组的数据与对照组相似。通过了解潜在的错误来源,例如洗剂残留物和其他残留颗粒,医疗保健专业人员以及患者可以更有效地利用SMBG。鼓励患者和卫生保健专业人员在读数前洗手以及用酒精清洁测试场所的重要性,以使他们可以识别常见错误并致力于改善糖尿病护理。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hayden Christine M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号