首页> 外文OA文献 >Cross comparison of two Analysis Tools for a Braceless Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine Versus Ocean Basin Test Results
【2h】

Cross comparison of two Analysis Tools for a Braceless Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine Versus Ocean Basin Test Results

机译:两种分析工具对无支撑半潜式风力涡轮机与海洋盆地的测试结果的交叉比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the frame of the IRPWIND project (Integrated Research Programme on Wind Energy), a benchmark is going on for comparing the numerical tools versus results obtained from ocean basin tests. A braceless semi-submersible wind turbine platform is considered herein. Real-time hybrid model (ReaTHM®) tests were done at 1:30 scale in MARINTEK’s Ocean Basin in 2015 (http://windbench.net/marintek). The goal was to estimate the performance of a novel hybrid technique which avoids the use of a physical turbine for reproducing the aerodynamic loads. Instead, these being representative of the Northern North Sea wind conditions, were in real time calculated by a Blade Element Momentum (BEM) software and subsequently applied by a 5-degree-of-freedom actuators on the structure. The mooring system was typical of a three catenary mooring lines while the waves were produced by flapping mechanisms at basin's borders. The above mentioned system produced experimental results that were taken as reference for calibrating numerical hydrodynamic and structural models [1, 2, 3].
机译:在IRPWIND项目(风能综合研究计划)的框架中,正在进行一个基准,用于将数值工具与从海盆试验获得的结果进行比较。本文考虑了无支撑半潜式风力涡轮机平台。 2015年,实时混合模型(ReaTHM®)测试以1:30的比例在MARINTEK的海洋盆地(http://windbench.net/marintek)中进行。目的是评估一种新型混合技术的性能,该技术可避免使用物理涡轮来再现空气动力学负荷。取而代之的是,这些代表北海北部的风况,是由叶片元素动量(BEM)软件实时计算,然后由5自由度执行器应用于结构。系泊系统是三个悬链系泊索的典型代表,而波浪是由盆地边界的拍打机制产生的。上述系统产生的实验结果可作为校准数值水动力和结构模型的参考[1,2,3]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号