首页> 外文OA文献 >Revisiting intersectionality for EU Anti-Discrimination Law in an economic crisis –a critical legal studies perspective
【2h】

Revisiting intersectionality for EU Anti-Discrimination Law in an economic crisis –a critical legal studies perspective

机译:在经济危机中重新审视欧盟《反歧视法》的交叉性-一种重要的法律研究视角

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article discusses the role of EU anti-discrimination law in challenging EU anti-crisis measures from a critical legal studies perspective. Critical legal scholarship is defined through its challenge of ‘lex’ through the vision of ‘ius’ and its critical links with social movements. EU anti-discrimination law attracts critique for constituting a compartmentalised socio-legal field, which prevents justice for those at intersections of inequalities. By defining as the aim of anti-discrimination law the combat of disadvantage resulting from ascribed otherness around the nodes sex/gender, race/ethnicity, and disability, the article suggests a convincing normative vision suitable to de-compartmentalise the field and adequately address intersectionality. This critical legal perspective on intersectionality differs from its sociological counterparts by omitting class as a category. The article demonstrates that this distinction is necessary for EU anti-discrimination law to maintain its critical edge.
机译:本文从批判性法律研究的角度讨论了欧盟反歧视法在挑战欧盟反危机措施中的作用。批判性法律奖学金的定义是通过对“ ius”的愿景和与社会运动的批判联系而对“ lex”的挑战。欧盟的反歧视法引起了人们对构成一个分隔的社会法律领域的批评,这阻碍了那些在不平等交汇处的人们的正义。通过将打击因性别/性别,种族/民族和残疾等节点周围的异性而导致的不利条件定义为反歧视法的目标,本文提出了一种令人信服的规范性愿景,适用于将该领域分解并充分解决交叉性问题。这种对交叉性的批判性法律观点与社会学观点不同,因为它忽略了类别。该文章表明,这种区别对于保持欧盟的反歧视法至关重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schiek Dagmar;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号