首页> 外文OA文献 >Using the voluntary sector to provide services to children and families with complex needs as an alternative to social work services- what are the benefits and risks?
【2h】

Using the voluntary sector to provide services to children and families with complex needs as an alternative to social work services- what are the benefits and risks?

机译:利用志愿部门为有复杂需求的儿童和家庭提供服务,以替代社会工作服务-好处和风险是什么?

摘要

Frequently, the voluntary sector can be involved in providing services and support to families and children with complex needs, which generally seek to complement existing statutory provision and avoid service duplication. Increasingly, the voluntary sector is being used to deliver these services due to their particular expertise and ability to engage service users (e.g. Acheson, 2001; Appleton, 2005; Bell, 2007; Buchbinder & Shoob, 2013; Collins, 2006). However, these services are being provided against a background of contracting State welfare service provision and neoliberal polices emphasising the role of the free market in providing more efficient and economical services (Alcock, 2012; Henriksen et al., 2015; Hogg & Barnes, 2011). These developments have created new opportunities for the voluntary sector to expand their role in providing social welfare services, increased government interactions with the voluntary sector and strengthened the ability of the voluntary sector to influence social welfare policy and service provision (Hogg & Barnes, 2011). Yet, despite the dominance of the voluntary sector in this area, there is a lack of robust research into the role of the voluntary sector in meeting the needs of families and children with complex needs and how this compares with available social work services (see Dickinson et al. 2012; Rees et al. 2012). This project sought to address this gap in our knowledge by answering the following four questions:1.What are the main issues with the commissioning, governance and delivery of services by the voluntary sector?2.What is currently known about how services provided by the voluntary sector can influence family outcomes and does this differ depending on the model of delivery and/or governance used?3.Does the voluntary sector supplement, hinder or substitute statutory social work services?4.Are there gaps in our knowledge, policies and/or data collection which may need to be addressed in order to develop an effective, efficient and economical model of service provision in this area?
机译:通常,志愿部门可以参与为有复杂需求的家庭和儿童提供服务和支持,这些家庭和儿童通常力求补充现有的法定规定并避免服务重复。志愿部门由于其特殊的专业知识和吸引服务用户的能力而越来越多地用于提供这些服务(例如Acheson,2001; Appleton,2005; Bell,2007; Buchbinder&Shoob,2013; Collins,2006)。但是,这些服务是在国家福利服务合同规定和新自由主义政策强调的背景下提供的,自由市场在提供更有效,更经济的服务中的作用(Alcock,2012; Henriksen等,2015; Hogg&Barnes,2011)。 )。这些发展为志愿部门创造了新的机会,以扩大其在提供社会福利服务中的作用,增加政府与志愿部门的互动,并增强志愿部门影响社会福利政策和服务提供的能力(Hogg&Barnes,2011)。 。然而,尽管志愿部门在这一领域占据主导地位,但缺乏对志愿部门在满足具有复杂需求的家庭和儿童的需求方面的作用以及与现有社会工作服务相比的强有力的研究(见迪金森等人,2012年; Rees等人,2012年)。该项目试图通过回答以下四个问题来解决我们在知识上的差距:1.自愿部门在服务的调试,治理和提供方面存在哪些主要问题?2。志愿部门可以影响家庭的结果,这取决于所采用的分娩和/或治理模式吗?3。志愿部门是否补充,阻碍或替代了法定的社会工作服务?4。我们的知识,政策和/是否存在差距还是可能需要解决数据收集问题以便在该领域开发有效,高效和经济的服务提供模型?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号