首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of work of breathing using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic breathing systems in children
【2h】

Comparison of work of breathing using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic breathing systems in children

机译:儿童吸脂和连续流麻醉呼吸系统的呼吸作用比较

摘要

We compared the work of breathing under general anaesthesia in children using drawover and continuous flow anaesthetic systems. A pilot study was conducted in four children weighing > 20 kg in whom it would usually be considered appropriate to use breathing systems designed for adult anaesthesia. The pilot study compared work of breathing using the Mapleson D breathing system and the Triservice Anaesthetic Apparatus (TSAA). Work of breathing was calculated using the modified Campbell technique that calculates work using a pressure volume loop derived from oesophageal pressure and airway gas volume measurements. We found no difference in the work of breathing when comparing the Mapleson D and the TSAA in children > 20 kg. Following completion of the pilot study, we conducted a study on 10 children weighing between 10 and 20 kg comparing work of breathing using the Mapleson F breathing system and the TSAA. We found no significant difference in the work of breathing between the Mapleson F and the TSAA for these children. The TSAA can therefore be recommended for use down to a lower weight limit of 10 kg.
机译:我们比较了使用麻醉药和连续流麻醉系统的儿童在全身麻醉下的呼吸作用。在四个体重> 20 kg的儿童中进行了一项初步研究,在这些儿童中,通常认为应该使用专为成人麻醉设计的呼吸系统。初步研究比较了使用Mapleson D呼吸系统和Triservice麻醉仪器(TSAA)进行的呼吸工作。使用改良的Campbell技术计算呼吸功,该技术使用从食道压力和气道气体量测量得出的压力量环路计算功。比较20公斤以上儿童的Mapleson D和TSAA时,我们发现呼吸工作没有差异。初步研究完成后,我们对10名体重在10至20公斤之间的儿童进行了研究,比较了使用Mapleson F呼吸系统和TSAA进行的呼吸工作。我们发现这些孩子的Mapleson F和TSAA之间的呼吸工作没有显着差异。因此,建议将TSAA的重量限制降低到10 kg以下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号