首页> 外文OA文献 >Reliability comparison of DFIG drive train configuration with PMG drive train configuration in the first 5 years of operation
【2h】

Reliability comparison of DFIG drive train configuration with PMG drive train configuration in the first 5 years of operation

机译:在运行的前5年中,DFIG传动系统配置与PMG传动系统配置的可靠性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Modern wind turbines vary greatly in their drive train configurations. With the variety of options available it can be difficult to determine which type is most suitable for on and offshore applications. A large percentage of modern drive trains consist of either doubly fed induction generators with partially rated converters or permanent magnet generators with fully rated converters. These configurations were the focus of this empirical reliability comparison. The turbine population for the analysis contained over 1800 doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) turbines and 400 permanent magnet generator (PMG) fully rated converter (FRC) turbines. The findings of this analysis show that, due to the poorer reliability of the FRC, the DFIG configuration proved the most reliable.
机译:现代风力涡轮机的传动系统配置差异很大。有了多种选择,可能很难确定哪种类型最适合陆上和海上应用。现代传动系统中有很大一部分是由带部分额定转换器的双馈感应发电机或带完全额定转换器的永磁发电机组成。这些配置是此经验可靠性比较的重点。用于分析的涡轮机群包含1800多台双馈感应发电机(DFIG)涡轮机和400永磁发电机(PMG)满额定转炉(FRC)涡轮机。该分析的结果表明,由于FRC的可靠性较差,DFIG配置被证明是最可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号