首页> 外文OA文献 >Optimizing urban structure: toward an integrated new urbanist model - urban nuclei and the geometry of streets: the 'emergent neighborhoods' model
【2h】

Optimizing urban structure: toward an integrated new urbanist model - urban nuclei and the geometry of streets: the 'emergent neighborhoods' model

机译:优化城市结构:朝着整合的新城市主义模型-城市核心和街道几何:“紧急社区”模型

摘要

A controversy remains among planners and urban designers about the proper location of the non-residential core (nucleus) of a neighborhood in relation to thoroughfares. One school of thought suggests that the nucleus should be located along the busiest thoroughfares; a second school holds that it must be some distance away from them - which, because of their disruptiveness, should form the edge of the neighborhood; and a third school proposes that it should be somewhere between the two as an 'eccentric nucleus'. The three schools may be overlooking the underlying variables that govern this problem under different conditions, and so we propose a model for establishing the best location and distribution of urban nuclei as these conditions vary. This requires firstly, a redefinition of the 'neighborhood' as distinguished from a 'pedestrian shed'. We argue that a 'neighborhood' can either emerge within a 'sanctuary area' between thoroughfares, or span across both 'sanctuary areas' and thoroughfares, if the latter are properly designed; a 'pedestrian shed', by contrast, can overlap with neighborhoods and with other pedestrian sheds. We propose a '400 meter rule', a surprisingly small maximum spacing of main thoroughfares that empirical observation shows that traditional, pedestrian-governed urban fabric has always tended to obey, for reasons that are likely to have to do with the self-organizing logic of pedestrian movement and social activity. In so doing, we advance a more fine-grained, permeable, potentially lower-carbon model and illustrate its advantages with several historic and modern examples.
机译:在规划者和城市设计师之间,关于邻里非住宅核心(核心)与通道的正确位置之间的争议仍然存在。一种观点认为,原子核应位于最繁忙的通道旁。第二所学校认为,它们必须相距一定距离-由于它们的破坏性,它们应该形成附近的边缘;第三所学校建议它应该在两者之间的某个地方作为“偏心核”。这三所学校可能忽略了在不同条件下控制该问题的潜在变量,因此,我们提出了一个模型,用于根据这些条件的变化确定城市核的最佳位置和分布。首先,这需要对“邻居”和“行人棚”的区别进行重新定义。我们认为,“邻里”既可以出现在通道之间的“保护区”内,也可以跨过“保护区”和通道(如果设计合理);相比之下,“行人棚”可以与邻里和其他行人棚重叠。我们提出了“ 400米法则”,即主要通道的最小间距,该值出乎意料地很小,根据经验观察,传统的,行人专用的城市结构始终倾向于遵循,这可能与自组织逻辑有关行人运动和社交活动。在此过程中,我们提出了一种更细粒度,可渗透性更高,碳含量可能更低的模型,并通过一些历史和现代示例来说明其优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号