首页> 外文OA文献 >Validation of the IPAQ against different accelerometer cut-points in older cancer survivors and adults at risk of cancer
【2h】

Validation of the IPAQ against different accelerometer cut-points in older cancer survivors and adults at risk of cancer

机译:针对老年癌症幸存者和有癌症风险的成年人针对不同加速度计分界点对IPAQ进行验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: The present study investigated the convergent validity of an interview-administered IPAQ long version (IPAQ-L) in an older population by comparison with objective accelerometry movement data. Methods: Data from 52 participants (mean age 67.9 years, 62% male) were included in the analysis. Treadmill derived (TM-ACC: 1952-5724 cpm) and free-living physical activity (PA) derived (FL-ACC: 760-5724 cpm) accelerometer cut-points were used as criterion. Results: IPAQ-L measures (total PA, leisure-time, walking-time, sedentary time) were significantly correlated with accelerometry (P≤0.05). Differences in sex were observed. Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement analysis showed that the IPAQ-L overestimated PA in relation to accelerometry. Conclusions: Our results show that an interview-administered IPAQ-L shows low to moderate convergent validity with objective PA measures in this population but there may be differences between males and females which should be further investigated.
机译:简介:本研究通过与客观的加速度计运动数据进行比较,研究了采访访问的IPAQ长版(IPAQ-L)在老年人中的收敛效度。方法:分析来自52名参与者(平均年龄67.9岁,男性62%)的数据。将跑步机衍生的(TM-ACC:1952-5724 cpm)和自由活动的身体活动(PA)衍生的(FL-ACC:760-5724 cpm)加速度计切点用作标准。结果:IPAQ-L量度(总PA,休闲时间,步行时间,久坐时间)与加速度计显着相关(P≤0.05)。观察到性别差异。 Bland-Altman协议限制分析表明,IPAQ-L在加速度计方面高估了功率放大器。结论:我们的结果表明,通过访谈进行的IPAQ-L在该人群中采用客观PA措施显示出低至中度的收敛效度,但男性和女性之间可能存在差异,应进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号