首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact assessment of Scottish independence on the space sector
【2h】

Impact assessment of Scottish independence on the space sector

机译:苏格兰独立对空间部门的影响评估

摘要

This politically neutral work explores the impact of independence on Scotland’s emerging, innovative and world leading civilian space sector. The ecosystem is explained and quantified, clarifying the distinction between the European Space Agency (ESA) and the European Union, which the White Paper, Scotland’s Future, has blurred. Aspects of the White Paper relating to the sector are highlighted and discussed. The proposed relationship between an independent Scotland (iScotland) and the UK Space Agency (UKSA) is unclear within the White Paper. As the spirit adopted in the White Paper is wherever possible to continue co-operation with existing UK bodies this scenario is considered, with membership of ESA via UKSA, alongside direct membership of ESA. Scottish independence could be said to be worth £15 – 20 million per year to the sector in the medium-term, and the long-term size and scale of the sector may be of order £100 million; almost triple the current size. However, this is dependent on the relationship established between iScotland and the rest-of-the-UK (rUK), and appears to require a contravention of the spirit of the White Paper. How iScotland chooses to maintain a formal relationship with UKSA is thus of vital importance, having both economic and legal implications. Seeking a continuing relationship would require agreement about delegation of ministerial power, sovereign funds and indemnity provisions in response to any government liability for damage. As regards membership of ESA and EUMETSAT in particular, the existing member states are required to agree to accession by iScotland and to set the conditions; any disruption or lack of access to international organisations, including the EU, could be a potentially significant problem. Post-independence, the scope of UK nationality, as opposed to citizenship, would also require clarification in the context of space and any on-going relationship with UKSA. The relationship with EUMETSAT via co-funding contributions to the Met Office requires further thought but does appear in principle to be a viable option. The same judgement of ‘viable’ can be reached when considering the Scottish government’s proposals around the Research Councils. However, whilst an approach may be viable, no assessment or judgement is offered as to its desirability from either an iScottish or rUK perspective.
机译:这项政治中立的工作探讨了独立对苏格兰新兴,创新和世界领先的民用航天部门的影响。对生态系统进行了解释和量化,阐明了欧洲航天局(ESA)与欧盟之间的区别,而《苏格兰的未来》白皮书对此已模糊了。白皮书中与该部门有关的方面得到强调和讨论。白皮书中不清楚独立的苏格兰(iScotland)与英国航天局(UKSA)之间的提议关系。由于白皮书中所采用的精神是尽可能与英国现有机构继续合作,因此考虑了这种情况,即通过UKSA成为ESA的成员,以及ESA的直接成员。从中期来看,苏格兰独立每年可为该行业带来15到2000万英镑的价值,而该行业的长期规模和规模则约为1亿英镑。几乎是当前大小的三倍。但是,这取决于iScotland与英国其余地区(rUK)之间建立的关系,并且似乎要求违反白皮书的精神。因此,iScotland如何选择与UKSA保持正式关系至关重要,具有经济和法律意义。寻求持续的关系将需要就授予政府权力,主权资金和赔偿条款达成共识,以应对政府的任何损害赔偿责任。关于特别是欧空局和欧洲气象卫星组织的成员资格,要求现有成员国同意加入苏格兰并设定条件;任何干扰或进入包括欧盟在内的国际组织的渠道都可能是潜在的重大问题。独立后,与国籍不同,英国国籍的范围也需要在空间以及与UKSA的任何持续关系的背景下进行澄清。通过对大都会办公室的共同资助与EUMETSAT的关系需要进一步考虑,但原则上确实是一个可行的选择。在考虑苏格兰政府围绕研究委员会的建议时,也可以得出同样的“可行”判断。但是,尽管该方法可行,但从iScottish或rUK的角度来看,都没有对其是否可取进行评估或判断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号