首页> 外文OA文献 >Public governance as a key determinant of FDI: a comparative analysis of sub-saharan Africa and south-east Asia host countries
【2h】

Public governance as a key determinant of FDI: a comparative analysis of sub-saharan Africa and south-east Asia host countries

机译:公共治理是外国直接投资的关键决定因素:撒哈拉以南非洲地区和东南亚东道国的比较分析

摘要

The World Bank (2000), in its report on Quality of Growth emphasises the importance of public governance as the keystone of a country's development. Studies examining determinants of foreign direct investment (FDI) are also increasingly taking account of such fundamentals as institutional and political factors. Thus, rule of law, bureaucratic corruption, educational attainment or quality of physical infrastructure are now included in econometric analyses next to more common variables such as market size, labour costs or trade openness. In other words, good governance appears to be a key condition for attracting FDI. For instance, Lehmann (1999), shows that a country like India could increase its share of US affiliates' physical investment by 50% if it were to eliminate all political uncertainty. For a developing country, the stakes for improving its public governance are high. Beyond an increase in its growth rate, a favourable business climate is likely to attract more FDI and enhance their alleged spillovers. More FDI means more financial resources for the host country, whereas it is likely that the technological intensity of these investments and the transfer of foreign know-how to domestic firms will largely depend on the quality of public governance. This article has three goals. First, to clarify why public governance is likely to influence FDI inflows. Second, to propose a new evaluation of public governance through the construction of quantitative, relatively objective, easily replicable and sample-specific indicators. The public governance of two geographic zones will be assessed through this method: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and South-East Asia (SEA). As shown in table 1.1, the former attracts much less FDI than the latter. Third, to test econometrically whether public governance explains the diverging abilities of SSA and SEA to attract FDI.
机译:世界银行(2000年)在其关于增长质量的报告中强调了公共治理作为一个国家发展的基石的重要性。研究外国直接投资(FDI)决定因素的研究也越来越多地考虑到制度和政治因素等基本因素。因此,经济计量分析中现在包括法治,官僚腐败,教育程度或物质基础设施的质量,旁边是更常见的变量,例如市场规模,劳动力成本或贸易开放度。换句话说,善治似乎是吸引外国直接投资的关键条件。例如,雷曼(Lehmann,1999)表明,如果要消除所有政治不确定性,像印度这样的国家可以将其在美国分支机构实物投资中的份额提高50%。对于发展中国家而言,改善其公共治理的风险很高。除了增长率的提高以外,有利的商业环境还可能吸引更多的外国直接投资并增强其所谓的溢出效应。外国直接投资的增加对东道国意味着更多的财政资源,而这些投资的技术强度和外国技术向国内公司的转让可能很大程度上取决于公共治理的质量。本文有三个目标。首先,要弄清楚为什么公共治理可能会影响外国直接投资的流入。第二,通过构建定量,相对客观,易于复制和针对特定样本的指标,提出对公共治理的新评估。将通过这种方法评估两个地理区域的公共治理:撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)和东南亚(SEA)。如表1.1所示,前者吸引的外国直接投资比后者少得多。第三,从计量角度检验公共治理是否解释了SSA和SEA吸引FDI的能力差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号