首页> 外文OA文献 >Health and economic benefits of public financing of epilepsy treatment in India : an agent-based simulation model
【2h】

Health and economic benefits of public financing of epilepsy treatment in India : an agent-based simulation model

机译:印度癫痫治疗公共融资的健康和经济利益:基于代理的模拟模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: An estimated 6-10 million people in India live with active epilepsy, and less than half are treated. We analyze the health and economic benefits of three scenarios of publicly financed national epilepsy programs that provide: (1) first-line antiepilepsy drugs (AEDs), (2) first- and second-line AEDs, and (3) first- and second-line AEDs and surgery. METHODS: We model the prevalence and distribution of epilepsy in India using IndiaSim, an agent-based, simulation model of the Indian population. Agents in the model are disease-free or in one of three disease states: untreated with seizures, treated with seizures, and treated without seizures. Outcome measures include the proportion of the population that has epilepsy and is untreated, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, and cost per DALY averted. Economic benefit measures estimated include out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure averted and money-metric value of insurance. RESULTS: All three scenarios represent a cost-effective use of resources and would avert 800,000-1 million DALYs per year in India relative to the current scenario. However, especially in poor regions and populations, scenario 1 (which publicly finances only first-line therapy) does not decrease the OOP expenditure or provide financial risk protection if we include care-seeking costs. The OOP expenditure averted increases from scenarios 1 through 3, and the money-metric value of insurance follows a similar trend between scenarios and typically decreases with wealth. In the first 10 years of scenarios 2 and 3, households avert on average over US$80 million per year in medical expenditure. SIGNIFICANCE: Expanding and publicly financing epilepsy treatment in India averts substantial disease burden. A universal public finance policy that covers only first-line AEDs may not provide significant financial risk protection. Covering costs for both first- and second-line therapy and other medical costs alleviates the financial burden from epilepsy and is cost-effective across wealth quintiles and in all Indian states.
机译:目的:估计印度有6千万人患有活动性癫痫,只有不到一半的人得到了治疗。我们分析了三种由公共资助的国家癫痫计划带来的健康和经济效益:(1)一线抗癫痫药(AED),(2)一线和二线AED,以及(3)一线和二线线AED和手术。方法:我们使用IndiaSim(基于代理的印度人口模拟模型)对印度癫痫的流行和分布进行建模。模型中的病原体无病或处于以下三种疾病状态之一:未经癫痫发作治疗,癫痫发作治疗和无癫痫发作。结果指标包括患有癫痫病且未得到治疗的人口比例,避免的伤残调整生命年(DALYs)和避免的DALY费用。估计的经济利益措施包括避免的自付费用(OOP)和保险的货币价值。结果:这三种方案都代表了资源的成本效益使用,相对于当前方案,印度每年将避免800,000-1,000,000 DALY。但是,特别是在贫困地区和人口中,方案1(仅公开资助一线治疗)不会减少OOP支出,也不会在我们将就诊费用包括在内的情况下提供财务风险保护。从方案1到方案3避免了OOP支出的增加,并且保险的货币计量值在方案之间遵循相似的趋势,并且通常随着财富的增加而降低。在方案2和方案3的前10年中,家庭平均每年避免医疗支出超过8000万美元。意义:在印度扩大和公共资助癫痫治疗可以避免巨大的疾病负担。仅涵盖一线AED的通用公共财政政策可能无法提供重大的金融风险保护。支付一线和二线治疗的费用以及其他医疗费用可减轻癫痫病造成的经济负担,并且在五分之一的财富人群和所有印度邦都具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号