首页> 外文OA文献 >Therapeutic residential care for children and youth : a consensus statement of the International Work Group on Therapeutic Residential Care
【2h】

Therapeutic residential care for children and youth : a consensus statement of the International Work Group on Therapeutic Residential Care

机译:儿童和青少年治疗性住宿护理:治疗性住宿护理国际工作组的共识声明

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In many developed countries around the world, "group care" interventions for children and adolescents have come under increasing scrutiny from central government, private philanthropic, and child advocacy agencies desirous of: achieving better outcomes for vulnerable children and youth; doing so in closer collaboration with their families and in closer proximity to their home communities and cultures in ways that reduce the potential for abuse while maximizing the use of informal helping resources; and, with the hope of reducing the high costs often associated with group residential provision. In some jurisdictions, efforts to reduce residential care resources in the absence of sufficient alternatives to serve high-resource needing youth has had unintended and negative consequences (Ainsworth & Hansen, 2005). Underpinning these many reform efforts has been a widely shared desire to design interventions that are effective and consistent with what is known about avoiding iatrogenic effects such as "deviancy training" and providing multiple opportunities for children to progress to the full limit of their developmental potential wherever they are served. Robbie Gilligan from Trinity College, Dublin has succinctly illuminated the challenges confronting those who seek to identify a place and purpose for high quality therapeutic residential care services in an overall child and family services system (Gilligan, 2014 Gilligan, R. (2014).
机译:在世界上许多发达国家,对儿童和青少年的“团体照料”干预措施受到了中央政府,私人慈善机构和儿童倡导机构的越来越多的关注,这些机构希望:为弱势儿童和青少年取得更好的成果;通过与家人的更紧密合作以及与家庭社区和文化的更紧密联系来做到这一点,以减少滥用的可能性,同时最大限度地利用非正式的帮助资源;并希望减少通常与集体住宿相关的高昂费用。在某些辖区,在缺乏足够的替代方案来满足需要大量资源的青年的情况下,减少住宿护理资源的努力产生了意想不到的负面影响(Ainsworth&Hansen,2005)。支持这些许多改革努力的是,人们普遍希望设计出有效的干预措施,这些干预措施应与已知的避免医源性作用(如“差异训练”)相一致,并为儿童提供多种机会,使他们无论何时何地都能充分发挥其发展潜力他们被送达。都柏林三一学院的罗比·吉利根(Robbie Gilligan)简洁地阐明了寻求在整个儿童和家庭服务系统中寻求高质量治疗性住宅护理服务的地点和目的的人们所面临的挑战(Gilligan,2014 Gilligan,R.(2014)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号