首页> 外文OA文献 >Don’t Be Silly: Lawmakers “Rarely” Read Legislation and Oftentimes Don’t Understand It . . . But That’s Okay
【2h】

Don’t Be Silly: Lawmakers “Rarely” Read Legislation and Oftentimes Don’t Understand It . . . But That’s Okay

机译:别傻了:立法者“很少”阅读立法,而有时却不理解。 。 。没关系

摘要

During the debate over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"), the reading and understanding of legislation became one of the most controversial issues mentioned in Congress and throughout the media. This led many to state that lawmakers should “read the bill,” and led one academic to propose a read-the-bill rule for Congress, where legislators would not vote or vote “no” if they had not read the full text of the legislation. My essay argues that in contemporary legislatures such proposals are unfeasible, and would ultimately produce lower quality legislation. In doing so, the piece uses interviews with legislative insiders (lawmakers, staffers, legal and political journalists) from Congress, Westminster, and the Scottish Parliament to demonstrate that the reading and understanding of legislation are highly overvalued. Additionally, it dispels the notion that the reading and understanding of legislation are larger legislative process or constitutional problems.
机译:在有关“患者保护和负担得起的医疗法案”(“ Obamacare”)的辩论中,对法律的阅读和理解成为国会和整个媒体中提到的最有争议的问题之一。这导致许多人指出,立法者应该“阅读法案”,并导致一位学者为国会提出一项“阅读法案”规则,在该规则中,立法者如果不阅读宪法的全文,就不会投票或投反对票。立法。我的文章认为,在当代立法机构中,此类提议是不可行的,最终将导致质量较低的立法。在此过程中,文章使用了来自国会,威斯敏斯特和苏格兰议会的立法内部人士(立法者,职员,法律和政治新闻工作者)的采访,以证明对法律的阅读和理解被高估了。此外,它消除了这样一种观念,即阅读和理解立法是更大的立法程序或宪法问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones Brian Christopher;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号