首页> 外文OA文献 >Foreign Policy between opt-outs and closer cooperation
【2h】

Foreign Policy between opt-outs and closer cooperation

机译:退出与更紧密合作之间的外交政策

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The legal framework which governs the foreign and security policy of the European Union (EU) provides an intriguing case study of flexibility. On the one hand, it has provided fertile ground for an impressive range of structures of flexibility, both formal and informal, which have emerged in different ways and for different reasons over the course of the development of Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) as a distinct strand of the Union's external action. On the other hand, flexibility has been inherent in the conduct of the policy as a matter of practice and quite independently from the legal mechanisms set out in the Union’s primary rules. udThis chapter will argue that there is a density of rules and procedures goverining flexibility which which has developed independently from the ad hoc arrangements prevailing in the area of secrity and defence as a matter of practice. This phenonemon illustrates a heavily proceduralised emphasis on law which is justified by neither prior experience, nor subsequent practice. The analysis is structured as follows. First, it will examine the typology of flexibility mechanisms set out in the rules which govern the CFSP and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). Secondly, it will explore the central position of flexibility in the design and application of the CFSP/CSDP system and its impact on the conduct of the Union's security and defence policy. Finally, it will reflect on the qualitative differences which characterize flexibility in this area compared to other strands of EU action.
机译:有关欧盟外交和安全政策的法律框架为灵活性提供了一个有趣的案例研究。一方面,它为正式和非正式的各种灵活结构提供了沃土,这些结构在共同外交与安全政策(CFSP)的发展过程中以不同的方式和不同的原因出现,联盟外部行动的一个明显部分。另一方面,实践中灵活性一直是政策实施所固有的,并且完全独立于国际电联主要规则中规定的法律机制。 ud本章将论证,存在着规管灵活性的规则和程序的密度,而这种密度和规则是独立于安全和防卫领域中普遍存在的临时安排而实际发展的。这种现象说明了对法律的程序化强调,既没有先验经验也没有后来的实践证明。分析的结构如下。首先,它将研究控制CFSP和通用安全与防御策略(CSDP)的规则中规定的灵活性机制的类型。其次,它将探索灵活性在CFSP / CSDP系统的设计和应用中的中心地位及其对国际电联安全与防卫政策实施的影响。最后,它将反思与欧盟行动的其他方面相比在这方面具有灵活性的定性差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Koutrakos P.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号