首页> 外文OA文献 >Effectiveness of UK optometric enhanced eye care services: a realist review of the literature
【2h】

Effectiveness of UK optometric enhanced eye care services: a realist review of the literature

机译:英国验光增强眼保健服务的有效性:文献的真实综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: UK demographic and legislative changes combined with increasing burdens on National Health Service manpower and budgets have led to extended roles for community optometrists providing locally-commissioned enhanced optometric services (EOS). This realist review's objectives were to develop programme theories that implicitly or explicitly explain quality outcomes for eye care provided by optometrists via EOS and to test these theories by investigating the effectiveness of services for cataract, glaucoma, and primary eye care. ududMETHODS: The review protocol was published on PROSPERO, and RAMESES publication standards were followed. Programme theories were formulated via scoping literature searches and expert consultation. The searching process involved all relevant electronic databases and grey literature, without restrictions on study design. Data synthesis focussed on questioning the integrity of each theory by considering supportive and refuting evidence from the source literature.ududRESULTS: Good evidence exists for cataract, glaucoma and primary eye care EOS that: with appropriate training, accredited optometrists manage patients commensurate with usual care standards; genuine partnerships can exist between community and hospital providers for cataract and glaucoma EOS; patient satisfaction with all three types of service is high; cost-effectiveness of services is unproven for cataract and primary eye care, while glaucoma EOS cost-effectiveness depends on service type; contextual factors may influence service success.ududCONCLUSIONS: The EOS reviewed are clinically effective and provide patient satisfaction but limited data is available on cost-effectiveness.
机译:目的:英国人口和立法的变化,加上国家卫生服务部门人力和预算负担的增加,导致社区验光师的作用扩大,他们提供本地委托的增强验光服务(EOS)。这篇现实主义者的评论的目的是建立隐含或明确解释验光师通过EOS提供的眼保健质量结果的程序理论,并通过调查白内障,青光眼和初级眼保健服务的有效性来测试这些理论。 ud ud方法:评审规程已在PROSPERO上发布,并遵循RAMESES出版标准。通过范围内的文献检索和专家咨询来制定程序理论。搜索过程涉及所有相关的电子数据库和灰色文献,而对研究设计没有限制。数据综合集中在通过考虑来源文献的支持和反驳证据来质疑每个理论的完整性。 ud ud结果:存在针对白内障,青光眼和初级眼保健EOS的良好证据,这些证据包括:经过适当的培训,合格的验光师可以管理与以下情况相称的患者:日常护理标准;白内障和青光眼EOS社区和医院提供者之间可以建立真正的伙伴关系;对这三种服务的患者满意度很高;对于白内障和初级眼保健,尚未证明服务的成本效益,而青光眼EOS的成本效益取决于服务类型;结论可能会影响服务的成功。 ud ud结论:所审查的EOS在临床上是有效的,并且可以使患者满意,但有关成本效益的数据有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号