首页> 外文OA文献 >Should we teach cooking in schools? A systematic review of the literature of school-based cooking interventions
【2h】

Should we teach cooking in schools? A systematic review of the literature of school-based cooking interventions

机译:我们应该在学校教烹饪吗?对学校烹饪干预文献的系统回顾

摘要

This paper reports the findings from a systematic review of the impact of practical cooking initiatives in schools. We draw out recommendations that could inform home economics interventions in schools and evaluations thereof. A systematic search was undertaken for articles published between 1995 and January 2008; this was supplemented by hand searches. Studies were reviewed and classified on a scale of 1 to 4 (1 = highest quality) according to reported methodological quality of evidence provided.ududFour papers were found that met the criteria for inclusion as evidence. The only intervention to be ranked as level 1 was one that delivered a mix of food and environment lessons (theory-based), practical cooking sessions, parental involvement and provision of plant-based foods at school lunch. Three studies met the level 2 standard of the review. One of these, based in the United States of America (USA), was a randomised control trial of an intervention over 6–8 weeks for low-income youth consisting of food tasting, fruit and vegetable preparation as well as other activities. The second was a one-group cohort, ‘before and after’ intervention that targeted ‘gypsy’ children in Bilbao, Spain. This involved school teachers, nutritionists and catering staff. Following intervention, 95% had increased knowledge scores, 60% reported preparing dishes made in the sessions at home, and increases in cooking confidence and consumption of fruit, vegetables, dairy and fish were also reported. The final study was an interactive computer-based intervention where pupils virtually prepared a fruit juice or vegetable recipe on a computer program and then prepared recipes for homework in their home kitchen. The results demonstrated an increase in post-test consumption, although this was associated with baseline consumption.ududAll the studies were short-term and none included long-term follow up so outcomes are not known. There is some evidence for an association between teaching cooking skills and improved nutrition knowledge, changing food preferences, increased confidence in cooking skills and healthier eating habits. However, while cooking lessons per se may positively affect consumption and attitude in the short-term, there was no long-term follow up and the review found very limited evidence on which to base policy.
机译:本文报告了对实际烹饪计划对学校的影响进行系统评估的结果。我们提出了一些建议,可以为学校进行家庭经济干预及其评估提供参考。系统地搜索了1995年至2008年1月之间发表的文章;这是手工搜索的补充。根据提供的证据的方法学质量,对研究进行了审查,并以1至4的等级进行分级(1 =最高质量)。 ud ud发现有四篇论文符合纳入标准。唯一被评为第一级的干预措施是结合了食品和环境课程(基于理论),实际烹饪课程,父母的参与以及学校午餐时提供的植物性食品的组合。三项研究达到了评价的2级标准。其中一项设在美利坚合众国(美国),是一项随机对照试验,对低收入青年进行为期6-8周的干预,包括品尝食物,水果和蔬菜制备以及其他活动。第二个是针对“西班牙前后”干预的“前后”干预的一组研究。这涉及学校教师,营养师和餐饮人员。干预后,有95%的人的知识得分提高了,有60%的人报告了在家里做饭时准备的菜肴,并且还增加了烹饪的自信心和水果,蔬菜,奶制品和鱼的消费。最终研究是基于计算机的交互式干预,学生可以在计算机程序上虚拟地准备果汁或蔬菜食谱,然后在自己的厨房准备家庭作业的食谱。结果表明测试后的消耗量增加了,尽管这与基线消耗量有关。 ud ud所有研究均为短期研究,没有长期随访,因此结果尚不清楚。有证据表明,在烹饪技巧的教学与营养知识的提高,食物偏好的改变,对烹饪技巧的增强信心以及更健康的饮食习惯之间存在关联。然而,尽管烹饪课本身可能在短期内对消费和态度产生积极影响,但没有长期的跟进措施,并且该审查发现制定政策的依据非常有限。

著录项

  • 作者

    Caraher M.; Wu M.; Seeley A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号