首页> 外文OA文献 >The influence of teaching practice I and teaching practice II on students’ english language proficiency at the Department of Foreign Languages of the University of El Salvador, academic year 2015.
【2h】

The influence of teaching practice I and teaching practice II on students’ english language proficiency at the Department of Foreign Languages of the University of El Salvador, academic year 2015.

机译:萨尔瓦多大学外语系的教学实践I和教学实践II对学生英语水平的影响,2015学年。

摘要

The University of El Salvador has always been recognized for preparing high quality of graduates in all majors. However, there is an issue taking place with most students from the English Teaching Major at the Foreign Language Department of the University of El Salvador. Those students take five intensive English courses for the first two years and a half of the major, after which they are expected to reach an advanced level of English. Yet according to the results obtained from a version of the TOEFL test, which students from Advanced II -2013 took in order to be placed in their Practice Teaching, the reached level was a high elementary level (A2) based on the CEF. Those results were verified by means of an equivalency table (see annexes) and also confirmed by Master Grace Gómez and Master Ricardo Cabrera, who are the professors in charge of that evaluation and the Practice Teaching courses. It is necessary to mentioned that previous researches related on this regard, English proficiency, have been done. For example, “Correlation between personality types and English proficiency” published in 2013, based on students who just finished the course advanced II-2012, which results established that 38% students reached a B2 level, 42% reached B1, and 5% reached a C1 level. In that research oral proficiency was not measured since the results were obtained from a practice TOEFL test. Besides, there is a second research called: “How personality and motivation affects oral proficiency”, also carried out with students from advanced II-2012. In this occasion, students went under an oral interview and the results were: 33% reached a B2 level, 21% a B1 level and 44% reached an A2 level. The results from the last research tend to agree more to the ones found in this particular research since after administering the practice TOEFL test and an oral interview, the majority of students reached an A2 level. This research was based on that interrogative: “How do Teaching Practice I and Teaching Practice II influence students’ English language proficiency level at the Department of Foreign Languages of the University of El Salvador, academic year 2015?” This research was carried out with students of Seminar II, semester II, 2015 since they took the last teaching practice courses. Those students were bound to take a version of Paper Based TOEFL Test (pBT TOEFL) in order to be placed in different subjects and departments at the University where would do their Teaching Practice. By doing so, students took a version of TOEFL to be placed in their teaching practice but they were also placed in the levels established by the CEF, using an equivalence table.
机译:萨尔瓦多大学一直以来为培养各个专业的高素质毕业生而闻名。但是,萨尔瓦多大学外语系英语教学专业的大多数学生都遇到了问题。这些学生在主修课程的头两年半中选修了五门强化英语课程,之后有望达到高级英语水平。然而,根据从TOEFL考试版本中获得的结果(高级II -2013的学生为了参加实践教学而参加考试),达到的水平是基于CEF的高基础水平(A2)。这些结果已通过等效表进行了验证(请参阅附件),并由负责该评估和实践教学课程的教授GraceGómez大师和Ricardo Cabrera大师确认。值得一提的是,有关英语熟练度的先前研究已经完成。例如,2013年发布的“人格类型与英语水平之间的相关性”以刚刚完成II-2012高级课程的学生为基础,结果表明38%的学生达到B2级,42%达到B1、5%达到C1级。在该研究中,由于从托福实践考试中获得了结果,因此没有测量口语水平。此外,还有第二项研究:“性格和动机如何影响口语水平”,该研究也与II-2012年级的学生进行。在这种情况下,学生接受了口头采访,结果是:33%达到B2级,21%达到B1级,44%达到A2级。上一次研究的结果与该特定研究的结果趋于一致,因为在进行了实践性TOEFL考试和口试后,大多数学生达到A2级。这项研究基于以下疑问:“教学实践I和教学实践II如何影响萨尔瓦多大学外语系2015年学生的英语水平?”自2015年第二期研修班的学生参加了最后的教学实践课程以来,这项研究一直在进行。这些学生必须参加纸质TOEFL考试(pBT TOEFL),以便被放置在大学的不同学科和部门中进行教学实践。通过这样做,学生将TOEFL的一个版本放在他们的教学实践中,但也使用等效表将它们放置在CEF建立的级别中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号