首页> 外文OA文献 >Seismic performance assessment of the UL FGG building on Hajdrihova st. by computer programs 3Muri and SAP2000
【2h】

Seismic performance assessment of the UL FGG building on Hajdrihova st. by computer programs 3Muri and SAP2000

机译:Hajdrihova s​​t。UL FGG建筑物的抗震性能评估。通过计算机程序3Muri和SAP2000

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this thesis, the seismic performance assessment of the UL FGG building on Hajdrihova st.udwas investigated by 3Muri and SAP2000 software. In the first chapter the behaviour of masonryudbuildings under seismic actions are presented with an emphasis on failure mechanisms ofudstructural components. Then follow the provisions of the Eurocode 8-3 standard, which dealsudwith seismic assessment of existing buildings. Further on, the simplified N2 method based onudnon-linear static (pushover) analysis is introduced. In the practical part of the thesis the ULudFGG building is presented. To achieve similar results in both programs we tried to make theudmodel in SAP similar to 3Muri model as much as possible. Eigenvalue analysis was performedudon three models – the 3Muri model, the SAP frame model and the SAP shell model. Audcomparison of natural periods has shown 4 % to 33 % smaller values for SAP models. Theudreason for differences could be in different mass moments of inertia. To check the influence ofudMMI, parametric analysis was performed. Results of the analysis have shown the need forudenhancement of the SAP model MMI to 220 % of its original value, but this kind of adjustmentudcannot be physically explained. Analysis also shows that the results for two SAP models areudmuch closer in comparison to each other than the results of any SAP model in comparison toudthe 3Muri model. This could be the result of different analysis methods – 3Muri using FME andudSAP using FEM. In an attempt to eliminate the differences between models in both programs,uda simpler model was analyzed. It turns out, the differences between models are not audconsequence of the definition of structural components. More likely the difference is causedudby not considering the same analysis method. Further on, the non-linear static analysis in bothudprograms was investigated. Non-linear behaviour of the material in SAP model was modeledudby defining the plastic hinges into elements of the/an equivalent frame. Again it turned out, theudresults of SAP and 3Muri models were far from similar.
机译:本文利用3Muri和SAP2000软件对位于Hajdrihova s​​t.ud的UL FGG建筑物的抗震性能进行了评估。在第一章中,介绍了砌体建筑在地震作用下的行为,重点是建筑构件的破坏机理。然后遵循欧洲规范8-3标准的规定,该标准涉及对现有建筑物的地震评估。进一步地,介绍了基于非线性非线性静态(推动)分析的简化N2方法。在论文的实际部分中,介绍了UL udFGG建筑物。为了在两个程序中获得相似的结果,我们尝试使SAP中的 udmodel尽可能类似于3Muri模型。本征值分析在三个模型上执行– 3Muri模型,SAP框架模型和SAP Shell模型。自然周期的比较显示SAP模型的值小4%至33%。差异的 dereason可能是在不同的惯性矩中。为了检查 udMMI的影响,执行了参数分析。分析结果表明,需要将SAP模型MMI增强至其原始值的220%,但是无法从物理上解释这种调整。分析还显示,与3Muri模型相比,两个SAP模型的结果彼此之间的距离比任何SAP模型的结果都更近。这可能是不同分析方法的结果–使用FME的3Muri和使用FEM的 udSAP。为了消除两个程序中模型之间的差异,分析了较简单的模型。事实证明,模型之间的差异并非结构组件定义的后果。不考虑相同的分析方法可能会导致差异。进一步,研究了两个程序中的非线性静态分析。通过将塑料铰链定义为等效框架的元素,可以对SAP模型中材料的非线性行为进行建模。再次证明,SAP和3Muri模型的结果远非如此。

著录项

  • 作者

    Siebenreich Neva;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号