首页> 外文OA文献 >The methodology for detennining production potential of agricultural and wooded lands in the land cadastre land capability evalvation
【2h】

The methodology for detennining production potential of agricultural and wooded lands in the land cadastre land capability evalvation

机译:土地地籍评估中确定农业和林地生产潜力的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This diploma thesis thoroughly presents the methodology for determining production potential of agricultural and wooded lands - land capability evaluation - in the land cadastre. Land capability evaluation began to be introduced in the 1970's, with Slovenia taking the Austrian and the German system as an example. For better understanding of the topic, the diploma thesis also puts great emphasis, beside the characteristics of the soul, on soil types, which can be found in Slovenia. In the continuation, a presentation on how land ratings in the land cadastre were established in Slovenia, and are nowadays administered and determined. In the practical part, a land capability evaluation for the three chosen field study examples (the Mengeš field) was conducted, based on the current methodology for land rating in the land cadastre. For the chosen study fields, the land ratings points from the land cadastre were compared with the land ratings determined on the basis of field study inspection and soil analysis. We reached an interesting conclusion. Although we had a limited sampling, it was obvious, that the land ratings determined in the fields highly differ from the land cadastre data in the cases, where the land has been object of use change in the nera past (in our case from forest to field). This is logic due to methodology of introduction of land quality ratings in the land cadastre based on the old land cadastral classification data.
机译:该文凭论文彻底介绍了确定地籍中农业和林地生产潜力的方法-土地能力评估。土地能力评估始于1970年代,以斯洛文尼亚为例,以奥地利和德国制度为例。为了更好地理解这一主题,文凭论文除了强调灵魂的特征外,还特别强调了土壤类型,这种土壤可以在斯洛文尼亚找到。接下来,将介绍斯洛文尼亚如何建立地籍中的土地等级,以及如何管理和确定土地等级。在实际部分中,根据当前地籍的土地评级方法,对三个选定的实地研究实例(Menges场)进行了土地能力评估。对于选定的研究领域,将地籍的土地评级点与根据实地研究检查和土壤分析确定的土地评级进行比较。我们得出了一个有趣的结论。尽管我们的抽样数量有限,但很明显,在过去的土地中,土地一直是土地用途变更的对象的情况下,在田间确定的土地等级与土地地籍数据存在很大差异(在我们的案例中是从森林到土地领域)。这是逻辑的,这是由于基于旧土地地籍分类数据在土地地籍中引入土地质量评级的方法所致。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kavčnik Martina;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"sl","name":"Slovene","id":39}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号