首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis of different types of ceilings in steel skeleton constructions
【2h】

Analysis of different types of ceilings in steel skeleton constructions

机译:钢骨架结构中不同类型天花板的分析

摘要

In this paper we will see a comparison between various types of ceilings and between-floor constructions. We compared a classical reinforced concrete plate, a classical reinforced concrete plate between secondary beams, a span reinforced concrete plate and a span reinforced concrete plate between secondary beams. In the first stage, we dimensioned and defined necessary quantity of materials. With the classical reinforced concrete plate, we used a computer programme ESA.Prima Win 3.6 to establish inner forces. The necessary quantity of armature reinforcement was determined by the limit states method. While dimensioning the span reinforced concrete plate, we used charts, provided by the manufacturer of particular sheet metal and a computer programme for calculating span ceilings used by the company Trimo. While dimensioning secondary beams (regular and span), we took in account European standards. After we established necessary quantity of materials for each type of ceiling, regarding the given load and span, we converted the results into final price. The prices were provided by the supplies department of the company Trimo. The price of each material consists of its transport to the construction site and its actual construction. In the case of classical reinforced concrete plate, the plate itself is supporting in one or two directions. Both, the classical reinforced concrete plate and span reinforced concrete plate between secondary beams, have the secondary beam at the half or at one third of the span b. Solutions for our examples of between-floor constructions are presented in following chapters. While presenting the results, we have included price comparisons and findings between each example. We have also estimated prices as to which type of ceiling is most suitable regarding the given load and span.
机译:在本文中,我们将比较各种类型的天花板和地板间结构。我们比较了传统的钢筋混凝土板,次级梁之间的古典钢筋混凝土板,跨度钢筋混凝土板和跨度钢筋混凝土板。在第一阶段,我们确定并定义了必要的材料数量。对于经典的钢筋混凝土板,我们使用计算机程序ESA.Prima Win 3.6建立内力。电枢加强的必要量通过极限状态法确定。在确定跨度钢筋混凝土板的尺寸时,我们使用了特殊钣金制造商提供的图表和Trimo公司使用的计算机程序来计算跨度天花板。在确定次光束(常规光束和跨度)的尺寸时,我们考虑了欧洲标准。在根据给定的载荷和跨度为每种类型的天花板确定了必要数量的材料之后,我们将结果转换为最终价格。价格由Trimo公司的耗材部门提供。每种材料的价格包括其到施工现场的运输和实际施工。对于经典钢筋混凝土板,该板本身在一个或两个方向上支撑。次级梁之间的经典钢筋混凝土板和跨度钢筋混凝土板都使次级梁位于跨度b的一半或三分之一处。以下各章介绍了我们在楼层之间进行施工的示例的解决方案。在介绍结果的同时,我们还包括了每个示例之间的价格比较和发现。对于给定的载荷和跨度,我们还估算了哪种天花板最合适的价格。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lazar Domen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"sl","name":"Slovene","id":39}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号