首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison between static and dynamic pile load test in marsh soil
【2h】

Comparison between static and dynamic pile load test in marsh soil

机译:沼泽土静,动桩荷载试验的比较

摘要

Construction of buildings has increased markedly over the past decades in areas of poor foundation soil, which led to increased need for construction of piles. In accordance with European standards, quality control of installed piles has to be done. Quickest and simplest test is low strain intergity test, but in cases of complex structures a static or dynamic pile load test must be made. Execution of tests and analysis of the results are very different, but the final results are the same. In general it is known that the static load test is more reliable, but the dynamic load test is more cost efficient and quicker. In the thesis we present the differences between these tests, and the results of both tests on a test pile built in marsh ground. Due to the fact, that the soil has a significant impact on ultimate pile bearing capacity, we properly invastigated the soil, and from the results calculated the pile ultimate bearing capacity. In the following chapters we present in detail both tests. Measurement results are analyzed and shown by a load - settlement curve. From the results we present findings and conclusions about the difference found during the experiment.
机译:在过去几十年中,在地基土壤贫瘠的地区,建筑物的建造显着增加,导致对桩的建造的需求增加。根据欧洲标准,必须对已安装桩进行质量控制。最快,最简单的测试是低应变完整性测试,但是在结构复杂的情况下,必须进行静态或动态桩载荷测试。测试的执行和结果的分析有很大的不同,但是最终结果是相同的。通常,众所周知,静态负载测试更可靠,但是动态负载测试更经济,更快捷。在本文中,我们介绍了这些测试之间的差异,以及在沼泽地面上建造的一个测试桩上的两个测试的结果。由于这一事实,土壤对桩的极限承载力有重大影响,因此我们对土壤进行了适当的调查,并根据结果计算出桩的极限承载力。在接下来的章节中,我们将详细介绍这两种测试。分析测量结果,并通过载荷-沉降曲线显示。从结果中,我们提出了关于实验期间发现的差异的发现和结论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Erbežnik Miha;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"sl","name":"Slovene","id":39}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号