首页> 外文OA文献 >The National Adult Reading Test: restandardisation against the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth edition
【2h】

The National Adult Reading Test: restandardisation against the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth edition

机译:全国成人阅读测试:根据韦氏成人智力量表进行第四次标准化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Since publication in 1982, the 50-item National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson, 1982; NART–R; Nelson & Willison, 1991) has remained a widely adopted method for estimating premorbid intelligence both for clinical and research purposes. However, the NART has not been standardised against the most recent revisions of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III (1997) and WAIS-IV (2008)). Our objective, therefore, was to produce reliable standardised estimates of WAIS-IV IQ from the NART. Ninety-two neurologically healthy British adults were assessed and regression equations calculated to produce population estimates of WAIS-IV full-scale IQ (FSIQ) and constituent index scores. Results showed strong NART/WAIS-IV FSIQ correlations with more moderate correlations observed between NART error and constituent index scores. FSIQ estimates were closely similar to the published WAIS and WAIS-R estimates at the high end of the distribution, but at the lower end were approximately equidistant from the highly discrepant WAIS (low) and WAIS-R (high) values. We conclude that the NART is likely to remain an important tool for estimating the impact of neurological damage on general cognitive ability. We advise caution in the use of older published WAIS and/or WAIS-R estimates for estimating premorbid WAIS-IV FSIQ, particularly for those with low NART scores.
机译:自1982年发布以来,全国成人阅读测试共50项(NART; Nelson,1982; NART-R; Nelson&Willison,1991),仍然是一种广泛用于临床和研究目的的病前智力评估方法。但是,NART尚未根据韦氏成人智力量表的最新修订版本进行标准化(WAIS-III(1997)和WAIS-IV(2008))。因此,我们的目标是从NART获得可靠的WAIS-IV IQ标准化评估。评估了92名神经系统健康的英国成年人,并计算了回归方程,以得出WAIS-IV全面智商(FSIQ)的人口估计值和组成指数得分。结果显示,NART / WAIS-IV FSIQ相关性很强,而NART误差与成分指数得分之间的相关性更中等。 FSIQ估计值在发布的高端与发布的WAIS和WAIS-R估计非常相似,但在下端与高度差异很大的WAIS(低)和WAIS-R(高)值大约等距。我们得出的结论是,NART可能仍然是评估神经系统损害对一般认知能力的影响的重要工具。我们建议谨慎使用较早发布的WAIS和/或WAIS-R估计值来估计病态前的WAIS-IV FSIQ,尤其是对于那些NART评分较低的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号