首页> 外文OA文献 >Entanglement verification and steering when Alice and Bob cannot be trusted
【2h】

Entanglement verification and steering when Alice and Bob cannot be trusted

机译:爱丽丝和鲍勃无法信任时的纠缠验证和指导

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Various protocols exist by which a referee can be convinced that two observers share an entangled resource. Such protocols typically specify the types of communication allowed, and the degrees of trust required, between the referee and each observer. Here it is shown that the need for any degree of trust of the observers by the referee can be completely removed via the referee using classical and quantum communication channels appropriately. In particular, trust-free verification of Bell nonlocality, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, and entanglement, respectively, requires two classical channels, one classical and one quantum channel, and two quantum channels. These channels correspond to suitable inputs of quantum randomness by the referee, which prevent the observers from mimicking entanglement using shared classical randomness. Our results generalize recent work by Buscemi [Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 200401 (2012)], and offer a perspective on the operational significance of that work. They also offer the possibility of simpler experimental demonstrations of the basic idea of quantum-refereed nonlocality tests.
机译:存在各种协议,通过这些协议可以使裁判确信两个观察者共享一个纠缠的资源。这样的协议通常指定裁判和每个观察者之间允许的通信类型以及所需的信任度。在此表明,可以适当地使用经典和量子通信通道通过裁判员完全消除裁判员对观察者的任何程度的信任。尤其是,贝尔非局部性,爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森转向和纠缠的无信任验证分别需要两个经典通道,一个经典通道和一个量子通道,以及两个量子通道。这些通道对应于裁判员适当的量子随机性输入,这防止了观察者使用共享的经典随机性来模仿纠缠。我们的结果概括了Buscemi [Phys。牧师,第108卷,200401(2012年)],并提供了对该工作的运营意义的看法。它们还提供了对量子引用的非局部性测试的基本概念进行更简单的实验演示的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号