首页> 外文OA文献 >Politically engaged geographical research with the community sector: is it encouraged by Australia’s higher education and research institutions?
【2h】

Politically engaged geographical research with the community sector: is it encouraged by Australia’s higher education and research institutions?

机译:与社区部门进行政治参与的地理研究:是否受到澳大利亚高等教育和研究机构的鼓励?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the application of neoliberal thinking to the higher education sector, measures of research quality and utility have proliferated in efforts to increase academic accountability, innovation, and contributions to public policy.We intend to reignite discussion about community activism and the role of the academic in response to trends in higher education policy and recent debate in Australia about research quality assessment and policy relevance. We challenge the common portrayal of the public sector as the sole locus of policy-making and argue the case for greater recognition of the role of the community sector and its research partners in policy development and implementation - one that is not given due attention in the discourse on or in measures of research value and impact. Informed by recent literature on governance and interpretative approaches to policy analysis, we draw on our combined experience conducting research with two Australian movements at the forefront of reforms to property rights institutions, legal standards, and norms relating to social and economic equity to outline the institutional tensions and structural impediments facing researchers working with the non-government sector. The paper documents the progressive roles the academic can play in such work, arguing that institutional change is required within the tertiary sector to support researchers to build closer, more trusting research partnerships in which due attention is given to social impact and relevance
机译:随着新自由主义思想在高等教育领域的应用,为提高学术责任感,创新能力和对公共政策的贡献,研究质量和效用的措施激增了。我们打算重新讨论关于社区行动主义和学术界的作用。对高等教育政策趋势的回应以及澳大利亚最近关于研究质量评估和政策相关性的辩论。我们挑战公共部门作为政策制定唯一场所的共同刻画,并争辩说有必要进一步认识到社区部门及其研究伙伴在政策制定和实施中的作用-在政策制定和实施中未给予应有的重视关于研究价值和影响的衡量或讨论。在有关治理和政策分析的解释方法的最新文献的指导下,我们借鉴了结合两个澳大利亚运动进行研究的经验,这两个运动是在产权制度,法律标准以及与社会和经济平等相关的规范改革的最前沿,以概述制度与非政府部门合作的研究人员面临的紧张局势和结构性障碍。该文件记录了学者在此类工作中可以发挥的进步作用,认为第三产业需要机构变革以支持研究人员建立更紧密,更信任的研究合作伙伴关系,并在其中充分关注社会影响和相关性

著录项

  • 作者

    Jackson Sue; Crabtree Louise;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号