首页> 外文OA文献 >Are teachers lost in thought with technology? Moving from Pedagogical Reasoning to Technological Pedagogical Reasoning
【2h】

Are teachers lost in thought with technology? Moving from Pedagogical Reasoning to Technological Pedagogical Reasoning

机译:教师是否对技术迷失了头脑?从教学论到技术教学论

摘要

Has Mishra and Koehler's (2007) wicked problem of teaching with technology caused teachers to be lost in thinking about technology? To help with moving knowledge into action Shulman (Shulman, 1987; Wilson, Shulman, & Richert, 1987) in his wisdom proposed a Model of Pedagogical Reasoning and Action (MPRA). From his original ideas many researchers have focused on talking about the Knowledge Base for Teaching (KBT) but missed Shulman's MPRA. This paper describes a doctoral research project that has been designed to understand how teachers pedagogically reason with technology and if this constitutes Technological Pedagogical Reasoning (TPR). The research project has used teachers' digital portfolios (teacher education digital and in-service teachers), stimulated recall interviews and think-aloud concept mapping to understand how teachers pedagogical reasoning. This paper presents some of the preliminary findings from the doctoral research project.
机译:Mishra和Koehler(2007)的技术教学问题是否导致教师对技术的思考迷失了方向?为了帮助将知识转化为行动,舒尔曼(Shulman,1987; Wilson,Shulman,&Richert,1987)提出了教学推理和行动模型(MPRA)。从他最初的想法开始,许多研究人员就专注于谈论教学知识库(KBT),但却错过了舒尔曼的MPRA。本文介绍了一项博士研究项目,旨在了解教师如何对技术进行教学推理,以及这是否构成了技术教学推理(TPR)。该研究项目使用了教师的数字档案袋(教师教育数字和在职教师),激发了回忆访谈和思考概念的映射,以了解教师的教学推理方式。本文介绍了博士研究项目的一些初步发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号