首页> 外文OA文献 >Order of instruction effects – do they make a difference when teaching senior chemistry with computer based visualizations?
【2h】

Order of instruction effects – do they make a difference when teaching senior chemistry with computer based visualizations?

机译:教学效果的顺序–使用基于计算机的可视化教学高级化学时,它们是否有所不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated whether conceptual development is greater if students learning senior chemistry hear teacher explanations and other traditional teaching approaches first then see computer based visualizations or vice versa. Five Canadian chemistry classes, taught by three different teachers, studied the topics of Le Chatelier's Principle and dynamic chemical equilibria using scientific visualizations with the explanation and visualizations in different orders. Conceptual development was measured using a 12 item test based on the Chemistry Concepts Inventory. Data was obtained about the students' abilities, learning styles (auditory, visual or kinesthetic) and sex, and the relationships between these factors and conceptual development due to the teaching sequences were investigated. It was found that teaching sequence is not important in terms of students' conceptual learning gains, across the whole cohort or for any of the three subgroups.
机译:这项研究调查了如果学习高级化学的学生先听老师的解释和其他传统的教学方法,然后再看基于计算机的可视化,反之亦然,则概念的发展是否更大。由三位不同的老师讲授的五个加拿大化学课,使用科学的可视化方法,以不同的顺序进行解释和可视化,研究了勒查特利尔原理和动态化学平衡的主题。使用基于化学概念清单的12项测试来测量概念发展。获得了有关学生的能力,学习方式(听觉,视觉或动觉)和性别的数据,并研究了这些因素与教学顺序导致的概念发展之间的关系。研究发现,对于整个队列或三个子组中的任何一个,就学生的概念性学习成果而言,教学顺序并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号