首页> 外文OA文献 >Case Note: Victoria University of Technology v Wilson Ors : The Supreme Court of Victoria Tries Some Socio-legal Analysis in Reconceptualising the Role of Academics
【2h】

Case Note: Victoria University of Technology v Wilson Ors : The Supreme Court of Victoria Tries Some Socio-legal Analysis in Reconceptualising the Role of Academics

机译:案例说明:维多利亚科技大学v威尔逊与奥尔斯:维多利亚最高法院在重新构想学者角色方面尝试了一些社会法律分析

摘要

In a recent decision Victoria University of Technology v Wilson & Ors the Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia, decided against two academic defendants in a case brought by their university employer over the ownership of intellectual property. The case turned on whether the academics invented the property within the scope of their employment and is interesting in the court's finding that the comparatively recent commercialisation of Australian universities had reconstructed the nature of academic work. The court held that a full professor and a senior lecturer - a middle level academic grade in Australian universities - had a fiduciary duty to account to their employer university for gains from business opportunities they learn of in the course of their employment.
机译:在最近的一项裁决中,维多利亚科技大学诉澳大利亚维多利亚州威尔逊与奥尔斯最高法院,在其大学雇主提起的有关知识产权所有权的一案中,对两名学术被告作出判决。该案的内容取决于学者们是否在其工作范围内发明了该房产,并且在法院的调查结果中发现,澳大利亚的大学相对较新的商业化已经重建了学术工作的性质,这一点很有趣。法院裁定,一名正教授和一名高级讲师(澳大利亚大学的中级学术水平)负有信托责任,要向其雇主大学说明其在就业过程中所获商业机会的收益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moodie Gavin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号