首页> 外文OA文献 >Thinking about Practice in Integrated Children's Services: Considering Transdisciplinarity
【2h】

Thinking about Practice in Integrated Children's Services: Considering Transdisciplinarity

机译:关于综合儿童服务实践的思考:考虑跨学科性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Integrated service delivery in the early childhood education and care sector is burgeoning as a direct result of government agendas in Australia that privilege services for young children and families, especially those considered most vulnerable and at risk. In many cases this means reviewing and revising current practice to work more collaboratively with other professionals. This paper reports the findings of one aspect of a larger Australian study entitled: 'Developing and sustaining pedagogical leadership in early childhood education and care professionals'. The focus of this paper is the understandings and practices of professionals in both Queensland and Victoria working in integrated Children's Services across the education, care, community and health sectors. The notion of transdisciplinary practice is also explored as a way to sustain practice. Qualitative data collection methods, including the 'Circles of Change' process, the 'Significant Change' method and semi-structured interviews were used. The findings indicate concerns around professional identity, feeling valued, role confusion and the boundaries imposed by funding regulations. Working in a transdisciplinary way was generally considered a useful way to move practice forward in these settings, although the ramifications for leadership that this approach brings requires further consideration.
机译:幼儿教育和护理部门中综合服务的提供正在迅速发展,这是澳大利亚政府议程的直接结果,该议程优先考虑为幼儿和家庭提供服务,特别是那些被认为最脆弱和处于危险中的家庭。在许多情况下,这意味着需要审查和修订当前的做法,以便与其他专业人员进行更多协作。本文报告了一项较大的澳大利亚研究的一个方面的发现,该研究的主题是:“发展和维持幼儿教育和护理专业人员的教学领导能力”。本文的重点是昆士兰州和维多利亚州的专业人士在教育,护理,社区和卫生部门的综合儿童服务中的理解和实践。还探讨了跨学科实践的概念,以此作为维持实践的一种方式。使用了定性数据收集方法,包括“变革圈子”过程,“重大变革”方法和半结构化访谈。研究结果表明,人们对职业身份,价值观,角色混淆以及资金法规的界限存在担忧。尽管在这种情况下领导力的后果需要进一步考虑,但通常认为跨学科工作是在这些情况下推动实践前进的有用方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号