首页> 外文OA文献 >How secure was that public service job? Redundancy in the Queensland Public Service
【2h】

How secure was that public service job? Redundancy in the Queensland Public Service

机译:这项公共服务工作的安全性如何?昆士兰州公共服务部门的冗余

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Public service employment has traditionally been perceived as secure and permanent. This security has been reduced in recent years, as economic pressures and broader public sector reforms have resulted in the redundancy of numerous public servants. While many consider this to be a revolutionary or novel trend, a review of the Queensland public service demonstrates that redundancies have long been a feature of public sector employment. The nature of redundancy appears to have changed over time, with earlier redundancies being largely related to economic circumstances, and those in more recent times being related less to economic cycles than to organisational decisions to restructure. The legislative provisions for redundancy have also changed and become more fl exible and accessible. This combination of the change in the nature of redundancy, and the more accessible provisions, is not consistent with the traditional rationale for public service tenure as a protection against political dismissal.
机译:传统上,公共服务就业被认为是安全和永久的。近年来,由于经济压力和更广泛的公共部门改革导致许多公务员的裁员,这种安全有所降低。尽管许多人认为这是一种革命性的或新颖的趋势,但对昆士兰州公共服务的回顾表明,冗员一直是公共部门就业的一个特征。冗余的性质似乎随着时间的推移而发生了变化,早期的冗余很大程度上与经济状况相关,而在最近的冗余中,与经济周期的相关性较小,而与重组的组织决策无关。冗余的法律规定也已更改,变得更加灵活和易于使用。裁员性质的变化和更容易获得的规定的这种组合与公共服务任期作为防止政治解雇的传统理由不符。

著录项

  • 作者

    Colley Linda;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号