首页> 外文OA文献 >OSCE Best Practice Guidelines: applicability for nursing simulations
【2h】

OSCE Best Practice Guidelines: applicability for nursing simulations

机译:欧安组织最佳实践指南:适用于护理模拟

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) have been used for many years within healthcare programmes as a measure of students’ and clinicians’ clinical performance. OSCEs are a form of simulation and are often summative but may be formative. This educational approach requires robust design based on sound pedagogy to assure practice and assessment of holistic nursing care. As part of a project testing seven OSCE best practice guidelines (BPGs) across three sites, the BPGs were applied to an existing simulation activity. The aim of this study was to determine the applicability and value of the OSCE BPGs in an existing formative simulation.Methods: A mixed methods approach was used to address the research question: in what ways do OSCE BPGs align with simulations. The BPGs were aligned and compared with all aspects of an existing simulation activity offered to first-year nursing students at a large city-based university, prior to their first clinical placement in an Australian healthcare setting. Survey questions, comprised of Likert scales and free-text responses, used at other sites were slightly modified for reference to simulation. Students’ opinions about the refined simulation activity were collected via electronic survey immediately following the simulation and from focus groups. Template analysis, using the BPGs as existing or a priori thematic codes, enabled interpretation and illumination of the data from both sources.Results: Few changes were made to the existing simulation plan and format. Students’ responses from surveys (n = 367) and four focus groups indicated that all seven BPGs were applicable for simulations in guiding their learning, particularly in the affective domain, and assisting their perceived needs in preparing for upcoming clinical practice.Discussion: Similarities were found in the intent of simulation and OSCEs informed by the BPGs to enable feedback to students about holistic practice across affective, cognitive and psychomotor domains. The similarities in this study are consistent with findings from exploring the applicability of the BPGs for OSCEs in other nursing education settings, contexts, universities and jurisdictions. The BPGs also aligned with other frameworks and standards often used to develop and deliver simulations.Conclusions: Findings from this study provide further evidence of the applicability of the seven OSCE BPGs to inform the development and delivery of, in this context, simulation activities for nurses. The manner in which simulation is offered to large cohorts requires further consideration to meet students’ needs in rehearsing the registered nurse role.
机译:背景:客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)在医疗保健计划中已经使用了很多年,用以衡量学生和临床医生的临床表现。 OSCE是一种模拟形式,通常是总结性的,但可能是形成性的。这种教育方法需要基于合理的教学法的稳健设计,以确保实践和对整体护理的评估。作为在三个站点上测试七个OSCE最佳实践准则(BPG)的项目的一部分,该BPG被应用于现有的模拟活动。这项研究的目的是确定OSCE BPG在现有的形成性模拟中的适用性和价值。方法:采用混合方法解决研究问题:OSCE BPG以何种方式与模拟保持一致。调整BPG,并将其与现有的模拟活动的各个方面进行比较,该模拟活动是在大型临床大学将其首次在澳大利亚医疗机构中进行临床安置之前,向在一所大型城市大学的一年级护理学生提供的。对其他站点使用的包括李克特量表和自由文本回答的调查问题进行了略微修改,以供参考。在模拟之后和焦点小组中,通过电子调查收集了学生对改进模拟活动的意见。使用BPG作为现有的或先验的主题代码进行模板分析,可以解释和阐明来自两个来源的数据。结果:对现有的模拟计划和格式进行了很少的更改。学生通过调查(n = 367)和四个焦点小组的回答表明,所有七个BPG均可用于模拟,以指导他们的学习,尤其是在情感领域,并帮助他们感知到的需求为即将到来的临床实践做准备。在BPG通知的模拟和OSCE的意图中发现,可以向学生反馈有关情感,认知和心理运动领域的整体练习的信息。这项研究的相似之处与探索BPG在OSCEs在其他护理教育环境,背景,大学和辖区中的适用性的发现是一致的。这些BPG还与通常用于开发和提供模拟的其他框架和标准保持一致。结论:本研究的发现进一步证明了七个OSCE BPG在此情况下可为护士进行模拟活动提供信息和信息。 。向大型队列提供模拟的方式需要进一步考虑,以满足学生在练习注册护士角色时的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号