首页> 外文OA文献 >NGOs as BOP market entry partners in state-corporatist China
【2h】

NGOs as BOP market entry partners in state-corporatist China

机译:非政府组织成为国营企业中国的国际收支市场准入合作伙伴

摘要

The study evaluates NGOs' suitability as base of the pyramid (BOP) market entry partners in a country-specific context. The current emerging BOP partnerships literature does little to address NGOs and BOP markets heterogeneity in company-NGO partnerships in a BOP market entry. Furthermore, virtually no studies on company-NGO partnerships in entering the Chinese BOP have been conducted. This study therefore contributes to the BOP partnerships literature and to understanding company-NGO partnership opportunities in China by evaluating the suitability of NGOs in China as partners in a BOP market entry, and by evaluating the relevancy of the NGO partners' supporting roles suggested in the BOP literature, in the Chinese context. Furthermore, the study explores how the Chinese state-corporatist system influences NGOs' operating conditions and the BOP partnership opportunities in China. The study followed a descriptive qualitative methodology. Data was collected primarily through face-to-face interviews with grassroots NGOs and international NGOs in Yunnan province, China. A total 9 interviews were conducted, which constitute the core data in the study. Furthermore, data from background interviews and secondary sources was used. The results indicate partner suitability among Chinese grassroots NGOs, but the regulatory environment and international NGOs' (INGO) shifting scope of interest may limit INGOs from partnering in an intermediary role against BOP literature suggestions. Therefore, large domestic NGOs could be better suited as the intermediary key partner than INGOs. The study also revealed that the NGO partner's supporting roles suggested in BOP literature could be partially irrelevant in China, and also new supporting roles specific to the Chinese context were discovered. Furthermore, the Chinese state-penetrated corporatist system was found to influence NGOs' operating environment significantly, but yet the NGOs appear to be somewhat independent in their agenda design and activities. Nevertheless, the government plays an important role in China in general, and government collaboration should be taken into account in BOP market entry and in the partnerships.
机译:该研究评估了非政府组织在特定国家背景下作为金字塔(BOP)市场进入合作伙伴基础的适合性。当前新兴的国际收支伙伴关系文献几乎无法解决非政府组织和国际收支市场在国际收支市场进入中公司与非政府组织伙伴关系中的异质性问题。此外,几乎没有关于进入中国BOP的公司与非政府组织伙伴关系的研究。因此,本研究通过评估中国非政府组织作为国际收支平衡表市场伙伴的适宜性,以及评估非政府组织伙伴在支持国际收支平衡表中建议的支持作用的相关性,有助于建立国际收支平衡表伙伴关系文献,并有助于理解中国公司与非政府组织建立伙伴关系的机会。国际收支文学,在中国背景下。此外,该研究还探讨了中国国有企业制度如何影响非政府组织的经营状况和在中国的国际收支伙伴关系。该研究遵循描述性定性方法。数据收集主要是通过与中国云南省的草根非政府组织和国际非政府组织进行面对面的采访而得出的。总共进行了9次访谈,构成了研究的核心数据。此外,还使用了来自背景访谈和辅助来源的数据。结果表明合作伙伴在中国基层非政府组织中的适用性,但监管环境和国际非政府组织(INGO)的利益转移范围可能会限制国际非政府组织在对抗BOP文献建议中发挥中介作用。因此,国内大型非政府组织比非政府组织更适合作为中介的主要合作伙伴。该研究还表明,国际收支平衡研究文献中建议的非政府组织伙伴的支持角色在中国可能是不相关的,而且还发现了针对中国背景的新支持角色。此外,发现中国政府渗透的法团制对非政府组织的运作环境有重大影响,但非政府组织在议程设计和活动上似乎有些独立。尽管如此,政府一般在中国仍起着重要作用,在国际收支市场进入和伙伴关系中应考虑政府的合作。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hellgren Antti;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号