首页> 外文OA文献 >Public Transit Capacity and Users' Choice: An
Experiment on Downs-Thomson Paradox
【2h】

Public Transit Capacity and Users' Choice: An
Experiment on Downs-Thomson Paradox

机译:公共交通容量和用户选择:《唐斯-汤姆森悖论》的实验

摘要

We study the Downs-Thomson paradox, a situation where an additional road capacitycan cause an overall increase in transport generalized cost and therefore a decrease in welfarefor transport users. To this end, we build an experiment based on a double market-entrygame (DMEG) where users have to choose between road and public transit after that the op-erator has choosen public transit capacity. The optimal strategy for operator is to minimizecapacity, and the equilibrium for users depend on the endogeneous public transit capacitycompared to exogeneous road capacity. The most important result is that we observe theDowns-Thomson paradox empirically in the laboratory: An increase in road capacity causesshift from road to rail and, at the end, increases total travel costs. But the contrary isnot true: A decrease in road capacity does not cause lower total travel costs, which is incontradiction with our theoretical model. Results also show that the capacity chosen byoperator di¤ers from Nash prediction, levels being signi…cantly higher than those predictedby our model. Moreover, users coordinate remarkably well on Nash equilibrium entry ratewhile capacity has been chosen by operator.
机译:我们研究了Downs-Thomson悖论,这种情况下,额外的道路通行能力会导致总体运输成本总体增加,从而降低运输用户的福利。为此,我们建立了一个基于双重市场进入游戏(DMEG)的实验,在这种情况下,用户必须在道路和公共交通之间进行选择,然后操作员才能选择公共交通的容量。运营商的最佳策略是最大程度地减少运力,而用户的均衡取决于内生的公共交通能力与外生的道路通行能力。最重要的结果是,我们在实验室中凭经验观察到了唐斯-汤姆森悖论:道路通行能力的提高导致道路从公路转向铁路,最终增加了总旅行成本。但事实并非如此:道路通行能力的下降并不会降低总的出行成本,这与我们的理论模型是矛盾的。结果还表明,操作员从纳什预测中选择的能力有所不同,其水平显着高于我们模型所预测的水平。此外,用户已经在纳什均衡进入率上进行了很好的协调,而运营商已经选择了容量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号