首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact of use of neonicotinoid insecticides on honey bees in the cultivation on spring oilseed crops in Finland. Interim report
【2h】

Impact of use of neonicotinoid insecticides on honey bees in the cultivation on spring oilseed crops in Finland. Interim report

机译:在芬兰春季油料作物种植中使用新烟碱类杀虫剂对蜜蜂的影响。中期报告

摘要

The Neomehi project is studying how neonicotinoid-based plant protection products used in the cultivation of oilseed rape and turnip rape affect honey bees in Finnish oilseed cultivation. The interim report brings together the main results of the first growing season.The experimental protocol included four trial fields where spring turnip rape was cultivated. Each trial field was treated in a different way with neonicotinoid insecticides: without neonicotinoids, foliar spraying with neonicotinoids (thiacloprid) against pollen beetles and/or seed treatment with neonicotinoids (thiametoxam) against flea beetles. The plant density and crop growth was determined in the trial fields. The number of honey bees and other pollinators was assessed with the applied line transect method during the growing season. Five test bee hives were located at the edge of each trial field. The condition of the bee hives was checked and the amount of bees and brood was counted 4-5 times during the summer season. Census was done also in autumn and in spring to get overwintering data. Bees and bee hive products from all test bee hives of the trial fields were analysed for residues of neonicotinoids. In addition, residues were analysed from samples collected as a survey from forty other bee hives in South-West Finland. Half of those bee hives were located close to oilseed cultivation and the other half far from oilseed cultivation.The crop growth was normal in three of the trial fields. In one trial field (seed treatment with neonicotinoids) the crop growth suffered probably because of too much varied drilling depth. According to the main results of the counting of pollinators, the number of honey bees in the trial fields was high when the crop growth was good and lower when crop growth was poor. In the field which was treated with foliar spraying with a neonicotinoid (thiacloprid) the number of honey bees decreased after the treatment. However, the number of honey bees clearly increased 2-3 days after the foliar treatment.The results of the first growing season did not show, that the use of neonicotinoids affects the success of bee colonies, which were located at the edge of the trial fields. Both the adult and the brood population dynamic curves showed typical levels and shape of bee and brood population development. The average range of food consumption of the bees during overwintering and the overwintering index (the relation of the number of adult bees in spring compared to the number of adult bees in the beginning of overwintering) showed also typical levels compared to normal bee colonies in South-West Finland. Two bee hives lost their queen during fall and winter. One of those hives was located in the field without use of neonicorinoids and the other in the field in which a seed treatment neonicotinoid was used. The winterlosses of the test bee colonies did not differ from the average winter losses (7 %) in the South-West of Finland.The results of the residue studies showed that residues of neonicotinoids migrate with pollen and nectar into bee hives. The total residue levels of seed treatment neonicotinoids, thiametoxam and chlothianide, were at such a low level, that acute harm to bees is unlikely. However, the residue levels, especially in nectar, resulted in an estimated exposure which is close to the chronic and acute sublethal risk limits presented in literature. Therefore, that kind of risk cannot fully be excluded. The neonicotinoid (thiacloprid) used as a foliar spray resulted in higher residue levels in certain samples than the seed treatment neonicotinoids, and on the other hand in higher estimated exposures. However, the toxicity of the neonicotinoids used in foliar sprayings is only a hundredth of the toxicity of the ones used in seed treatmentand therefore the exposure is estimated to be clearly below the risk limits.The Neomehi project continued with the new field experiments in this summer. Final report based onwider research data will be published in 2015.
机译:Neomehi项目正在研究用于油菜和萝卜油菜种植的新烟碱类植物保护产品如何影响芬兰油菜种植中的蜜蜂。中期报告汇总了第一个生长季节的主要结果。试验方案包括四个试验田,种植了春季萝卜油菜。每个试验田都使用新烟碱类杀虫剂以不同的方式进行处理:不使用新烟碱类杀虫剂,对新花粉甲虫进行叶面喷洒新烟碱类(噻虫啉)和/或对跳蚤甲虫用新烟碱类(噻虫嗪)进行种子处理。在试验田中确定了植物密度和作物生长。在生长季节,通过应用线样法评估蜜蜂和其他传粉媒介的数量。在每个试验场的边缘有五个试验蜂箱。在夏季,检查蜂箱的状况,并计算蜜蜂和育雏量4-5次。还在秋季和春季进行了普查,以获取越冬数据。分析了试验田所有测试蜂箱中的蜜蜂和蜂巢产品中新烟碱的残留量。此外,还分析了芬兰西南部其他40个蜂巢中收集的样本中的残留物。这些蜂箱中有一半靠近油料作物种植,另一半则远离油料种子种植。三个试验田的作物生长正常。在一个试验田(用新烟碱处理种子)中,作物生长受苦的原因可能是钻孔深度变化太大。根据授粉媒介计数的主要结果,当农作物生长良好时,试验田中的蜜蜂数量较高,而当农作物生长不良时,蜜蜂数量较低。在用新烟碱(噻虫啉)进行叶面喷洒处理的田地中,处理后蜜蜂的数量减少了。然而,叶面处理后2-3天,蜜蜂的数量明显增加。第一个生长季节的结果并未表明,使用新烟碱类药物会影响位于试验边缘的蜂群的成功。领域。成年和育雏种群的动态曲线均显示出蜜蜂和育雏种群发育的典型水平和形状。与南方的正常蜂群相比,越冬期间蜂的平均食物消耗范围和越冬指数(春季成年蜂的数量与越冬开始时成年蜂的数量的关系)也显示出典型水平。 -西芬兰。在秋天和冬天,两个蜂巢失去了女王。这些蜂箱中的一个位于不使用新烟碱类物质的田地中,另一个在使用种子处理新烟碱的领域中。测试蜂群的冬季损失与芬兰西南部的平均冬季损失没有差异(7%)。残留物研究结果表明,新烟碱残留物随花粉和花蜜迁移到蜂巢中。种子处理类烟碱,噻虫嗪和氯噻吩的总残留量处于如此低的水平,以致不可能对蜜蜂造成急性伤害。但是,残留水平,尤其是在花蜜中的残留水平导致估计的暴露量接近文献中提出的慢性和急性亚致死风险限值。因此,不能完全排除这种风险。用作叶面喷雾剂的新烟碱(噻虫啉)在某些样品中的残留量高于种子处理的新烟碱,而另一方面,估计的暴露量也更高。但是,叶面喷剂中使用的新烟碱类药物的毒性仅为种子处理中所用的新药的毒性的一百分之一,因此据估计暴露量明显低于风险极限.Neomehi项目在今年夏天继续进行了新的田间试验。基于更广泛研究数据的最终报告将于2015年发布。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ketola Jarmo; Hakala Kati;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号