首页> 外文OA文献 >Eastern Europe in transition, the case of Hungary. The readjustment of public administration, programs and aspects of the transformation of public administration in Hungary between 1990–2002
【2h】

Eastern Europe in transition, the case of Hungary. The readjustment of public administration, programs and aspects of the transformation of public administration in Hungary between 1990–2002

机译:东欧转型期,匈牙利为例。 1990-2002年间匈牙利公共行政管理的调整,计划以及公共行政管理转变的各个方面

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The result of circumspect and considerate preliminary work, by 1990, the system of public administration characteristic of bourgeois, democratic and constitutional states was established in Hungary. The transformation of public administration is still far from complete, since fundamental reforms encompassing both structural and functional measures, and also the unified regulation of public sector human resources, urgently need to be effectuated. The continuous and rapid transformation exhausted public administration after a period and the reform programs with low efficiency discredited the ideas promoting the necessity of reforms themselves. Public administration weary of the reforms itself became gradually not supportive of, but passively resistant to the cause of the reforms, which merely reinforced the philosophy of NPM based on a neoliberal conception of the state implying that public administration cannot be reformed from within. In certain cases Hungary was under an excessive illusion concerning both NPM and EAS, it was more responsive to them than the other countries concerned. Today, however, as a party both to the European Union and EAS, Hungary with its specific experiences can contribute to the development of European public administration.Currently running complex program of the development of public administration alludes to a more considerate and subtle approach, which related to the consideration of international experiences sets forth that “any solution originating abroad or in the market may be applied exclusively with proper criticism and the examination of its effects.”ud
机译:经过认真和周密的前期工作的结果,到1990年,匈牙利建立了资产阶级,民主和宪政国家特色的公共行政体系。由于迫切需要进行包括结构性和功能性措施以及公共部门人力资源的统一监管在内的根本性改革,因此公共行政管理的转变还远远没有完成。经过一段时间的持续,快速的变革使公共行政工作筋疲力尽,效率低下的改革计划使促进改革本身必要性的思想disc贬。公共行政厌倦了改革本身,逐渐变得不支持改革,而是被动地抵制改革的原因,这仅仅是基于国家的新自由主义观念加强了NPM的哲学,这意味着不能从内部进行公共改革。在某些情况下,匈牙利对NPM和EAS都抱有过高的幻想,与其他有关国家相比,匈牙利对它们的反应更快。然而,今天,作为欧盟和EAS的政党,匈牙利以其独特的经验可以为欧洲公共行政的发展做出贡献。当前,运行复杂的公共行政发展计划暗示着一种更体贴和微妙的方法。与国际经验的考虑有关的是,“源自国外或市场的任何解决方案都只能通过适当的批评和对其效果的检验来应用。” ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Balázs István;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 hu
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号