首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of different methods of antioxidant activity evaluation of green and roast C. Arabica and C. Robusta coffee beans
【2h】

Comparison of different methods of antioxidant activity evaluation of green and roast C. Arabica and C. Robusta coffee beans

机译:生和烤C.Arabica和C.Robusta咖啡豆不同抗氧化剂活性评估方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Coffee beans contain a large amount of antioxidants, which are subjected to various changes during roasting. In this study, antioxidant potential of raw and roasted to different degree (light, medium, dark) C. arabica and C. robusta coffee beans was evaluated by the four antioxidant assay methods, TPC, FRAP, TEAC, and DPPH˙.udThe obtained results revealed significant differences between the coffee types, roasting degree, and antioxidant activity assessment methods. FRAP and TPC appeared to be the most appropriate methods for revealing the differences in antioxidant potential of different coffee types and the effects of roasting. The results obtained by these methods were in good correlation. ABTS and DPPH? methods are not enough sensitive for the determination of roasting degrees.udIn general, based on statistical data evaluation, antioxidant activity is more dependent on the coffee type than on the degree of roasting, however, the selection of analytical method may also be significant.ud
机译:咖啡豆包含大量的抗氧化剂,在烘焙过程中会发生各种变化。在这项研究中,通过TPC,FRAP,TEAC和DPPH˙这四种抗氧化剂测定方法评估了生咖啡豆和烘焙到不同程度(浅色,中等,深色)的阿拉伯咖啡和罗布斯塔咖啡的抗氧化能力。获得的结果表明,咖啡类型,烘焙度和抗氧化活性评估方法之间存在显着差异。 FRAP和TPC似乎是揭示不同类型咖啡抗氧化剂潜力差异和烘焙效果的最合适方法。通过这些方法获得的结果具有良好的相关性。 ABTS和DPPH?通常,基于统计数据评估,抗氧化剂活性更依赖于咖啡类型,而不是依赖于烘焙程度,但是,分析方法的选择也可能很重要。 ud

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号