首页> 外文OA文献 >Trademark Infringement by Domain Name Registrars
【2h】

Trademark Infringement by Domain Name Registrars

机译:域名注册商的商标侵权

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

section 27(4) of the Trademark Act, as amended in 2005, provides enforcement against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party (that is usually the infringer itself) for the infringement. In the HYUNDAI case the registrars of the domain names, trusted by the resellers of cars having formerly been members of the HYUNDAI commercial chain in Hungary, were sued together with the resellers for the reason that they did not cancel the registration of the domain names after the commercial chain had been ceased. The Hungarian courts of first and second instance built their judgements on the ECJ’s BMW judgement (C-63/97). Emphasis is given also on a case relating to infringement by an operator of an Internet home page, as the latter was condemned by the Hungarian Court of first instance for not complying with the Act on Electronic Commerce. Nevertheless, the court of second instance condemned him not therefore but for the tort in respect of the provisions of the Civil Code, e.g. for injury of reputation. Finally, the article is closed by an outlook on ideas on the development of EC law relating to liability of intermediaries.ud
机译:2005年修订的《商标法》第27(4)条针对由第三方(通常是侵权人本身)使用其服务的中介机构强制执行侵权行为。在HYUNDAI案中,以前是匈牙利HYUNDAI商业链成员的汽车转售商所信任的域名注册商与转售商一起被起诉,原因是他们在注册后未取消域名注册商业链已经停止。匈牙利一审和二审法院的判决是基于欧洲法院的宝马判决(C-63 / 97)。还强调了与互联网首页的经营者侵权有关的案件,因为匈牙利首页一审法院谴责后者违反了《电子商务法》。但是,二审法院因此不对他定罪,而是对《民法》规定的侵权行为定罪。损害名誉。最后,本文以关于与中介人责任有关的欧共体法律发展观点的观点作为结尾。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vida Sándor;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 hu
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号