首页> 外文OA文献 >A csernobili baleset térbeli hatása a Poleszje demográfiai és urbanizációs folyamataira = Effects of the Chernobyl disaster on the spatial demographic and urbanization processes of the Polesye region
【2h】

A csernobili baleset térbeli hatása a Poleszje demográfiai és urbanizációs folyamataira = Effects of the Chernobyl disaster on the spatial demographic and urbanization processes of the Polesye region

机译:切尔诺贝利事故对波兰人地区的人口和城市化进程的空间影响=切尔诺贝利灾害对波兰人地区的空间人口和城市化进程的影响

摘要

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effect of the Chernobyl disaster on the regional structures of demographic development and urbanisation. Data on all districts (rayons) of Ukraine and Belarus and all districts of nine oblasts in the Russian Federation, totalling 846 territorial units, served as a basis for the survey. Three population censuses were held since the accident and the regional dynamics and structures over the past thirty years could easily be traced using the census data. Using factor (principal component) analysis an attempt was made to demonstrate principal differentiating demographic and urbanisation dimensions within the studied region, and to define among them those specific to the space affected by the accident which could then be disclosed as its consequence, i.e. the Chernobyl factor. Besides the quantitative analysis, field surveys were carried out in 2011 and 2012 both in Belarus (Brahin, Khoyniki, Elsk rayons) and Ukraine (Polisske, Narodichi, Ovruch rayons). Interviews were conducted in Luhiny (Ukraine) and Lelchitsy (Belarus) rayons. Both areas are located close to the zone of evacuation and have been affected by the higher levels of radioactivity. In the 10–15 years following the accident demographic processes took place basically at national and regional levels. Spontaneous migration and resettlement of the population had a profound impact upon demographic processes over extensive areas. In the 15–25 years after the accident these movements had slowed down. Local movements within the rayons, chiefly resettlement from the villages to the rayon center, came to the fore and this phenomenon became more apparent than in other regions. In the course of the survey it has become evident that regional population dynamics of the studied area have not been changed profoundly by the Chernobyl accident, but its effect could be proved for some indicators and in some smaller areas. Population loss would prevail even without the “Chernobyl effect”; it was merely accelerated by the accident. Population density was low earlier and it became even sparser afterwards. The event exerted a fundamental impact upon urbanization processes and settlement hierarchy. The initial set of indicators applied for the factor analysis contained both dynamic and static demography indicators that were separated from each other in the ultimate factor structure. The strongest factor reflected the rural settlement pattern as it contained indicators like density and size of rural settlements, rural population density, and change in the rural population. The second factor describing demography dynamics consisted of data on natural change in population. The third factor differed from the two dimensions above as it was characterized by variables referring both to the dynamic and structural elements in a mixed manner. In rayons without larger urban centres, i.e. of a low level of urbanization but with a high proportion of contaminated areas, higher factor values were obtained as well. This is a consequence of the situation in which the population is concentrated in decontaminated patches or in less polluted places within contaminated areas. Larger settlements and rayon seats suffer from population loss to a lesser extent than the average settlements. In contrast, tiny villages of peripheral setting experience a rapid depopulation. As a result a kind of enforced “urbanization” has been taking place, when urban population is also decreasing, with the exception of Belarus. In Ukraine it is the dichotomy of the Kiev agglomeration as a growth pole vs. the Chernihiv Oblast as a depressive negative pole that creates a conspicuous situation. This is mixed with the “Chernobyl effect” having modified the regional structure. In Russia the resettlement and negative processes have affected the Bryansk Oblast exclusively. In the Tula and Oryol Oblasts which have been also contaminated to a considerable extent, regional policies have not dealt with the issue, and the consequences of the accident virtually do not control demographic processes.
机译:这项研究的目的是证明切尔诺贝利灾难对人口发展和城市化的区域结构的影响。乌克兰和白俄罗斯所有地区(人造丝)以及俄罗斯联邦九个州的所有地区的数据总计846个领土单位,作为调查的基础。自事故发生以来,进行了三次人口普查,可以使用普查数据轻松追踪过去三十年的区域动态和结构。使用因子(主要成分)分析,试图证明所研究区域内主要的人口统计学和城市化维度,并在其中定义特定于受事故影响的空间的那些,然后可以将其披露为后果,即切尔诺贝利因子。除了定量分析外,还分别在2011年和2012年在白俄罗斯(布林,科尼基,埃尔斯克人造丝)和乌克兰(波利斯基,纳罗迪奇,奥夫鲁奇人造丝)进行了实地调查。采访在Luhiny(乌克兰)和Lelchitsy(白俄罗斯)人造丝上进行。这两个区域都靠近疏散区,并受到较高放射性水平的影响。在事故发生后的10-15年内,人口统计过程基本上发生在国家和地区级别。人口的自发迁移和重新安置对广泛地区的人口统计过程产生了深远的影响。事故发生后的15-25年间,这些运动减慢了速度。人造丝内部的局部运动(主要是从村庄到人造丝中心的重新安置)开始受到关注,这种现象比其他地区更加明显。在调查过程中,很明显的是,切尔诺贝利事故并未对研究区域的区域人口动态产生重大影响,但可以在某些指标和较小区域证明这一影响。即使没有“切尔诺贝利效应”,人口流失仍将普遍存在;它只是由于事故而加速了。人口密度较早降低,此后甚至变得稀疏。该事件对城市化进程和居民点等级产生了根本影响。最初用于因子分析的一组指标包含动态和静态人口统计学指标,它们在最终因子结构中彼此分开。最强的因素反映了农村居民点格局,因为它包含诸如农村居民点的密度和规模,农村人口密度以及农村人口变化等指标。描述人口动态的第二个因素是人口自然变化的数据。第三个因素与上述两个方面不同,因为它的特征在于变量以混合方式同时涉及动力和结构要素。在没有较大的城市中心的人造丝中,即城市化水平低但受污染区域比例高的人造丝,也可以获得较高的因子值。这是由于人口集中在受污染区域或污染区域内污染较少的地方造成的。与平均定居点相比,较大的定居点和人造丝座椅遭受人口损失的程度要小一些。相反,周边小村庄的人口迅速减少。结果,除了白俄罗斯之外,城市人口也在减少,这种强迫性的“城市化”正在发生。在乌克兰,基辅集聚区是增长极,而切尔尼戈夫州是压抑性负极,这引起了人们的关注。这与修改区域结构的“切尔诺贝利效应”混合在一起。在俄罗斯,移民和负面影响仅对布良斯克州产生了影响。在也受到严重污染的图拉州和奥廖尔州,区域政策并未解决这一问题,事故的后果实际上并不能控制人口统计进程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Karácsonyi Dávid;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 hu
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:42:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号