首页> 外文OA文献 >Clinical evaluation of Basti administered by Basti Putak (Pressure method), Enema pot method (Gravity fed method), and syringe method in Kshinashukra (Oligozoospermia)
【2h】

Clinical evaluation of Basti administered by Basti Putak (Pressure method), Enema pot method (Gravity fed method), and syringe method in Kshinashukra (Oligozoospermia)

机译:通过Basti Putak(压力法),灌肠壶法(重力饲喂法)和注射器法对Kshinashukra(少精子症)给药的Basti进行临床评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this study was to determine which method of administration of Basti is more efficacious. The study design was open randomized clinical trial and main outcome measures are Administration time, Retention time, Pervasion of Basti, Semenogram study, and Sexual parameters. The result: Sperm count was increased by 70.75% in Basti putak group and 54.07% in Enema pot group. Overall average retention time of Asthapana Basti and Anuvasana Basti was 1.5 times more in Basti putak group than the Enema pot group. The conclusion of this study was that Basti putak is more efficacious than Enema pot method.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定哪种Basti的管理方法更有效。研究设计是开放式随机临床试验,主要结局指标包括给药时间,保留时间,巴斯蒂渗透,精液图研究和性参数。结果:Basti putak组的精子数量增加了70.75%,灌肠壶组的精子数量增加了54.07%。巴斯德普塔克组的Asthapana Basti和Anuvasana Basti的总体平均保留时间是En灌罐组的1.5倍。这项研究的结论是,Basti putak比灌肠壶法更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号