首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative study of intramuscular buprenorphine and morphine in the treatment of chronic pain of malignant origin.
【2h】

A comparative study of intramuscular buprenorphine and morphine in the treatment of chronic pain of malignant origin.

机译:肌内丁丙诺啡和吗啡治疗恶性源性慢性疼痛的比较研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

1 Twenty-seven patients with moderate to severe chronic pain of malignant origin received buprenorphine (0.3 mg) and morphine (10 mg) intramuscularly in a double-blind, single dose within patient study. 2 Efficacy analysis demonstrated no significant differences in the peak analgesic effects or in the time to reach these effects. However, buprenorphine had a significantly longer duration of action than morphine. 3 Sedation was the most frequent unwanted effect with a similar incidence following each treatment. Buprenorphine was associated with a significantly higher incidence, greater severity, earlier onset, and longer duration of dizziness, nausea and vomiting than morphine. 4 Following both treatments there were small but significant decreases in pulse rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate.
机译:1 27名患有恶性起源的中度至重度慢性疼痛的患者在患者研究中以双盲单剂肌内注射了丁丙诺啡(0.3 mg)和吗啡(10 mg)。 2功效分析表明,止痛效果的峰值或达到这些效果的时间无明显差异。但是,丁丙诺啡的作用时间比吗啡长得多。 3镇静是最常见的不良反应,每次治疗后的发生率相似。与吗啡相比,丁丙诺啡的发生率,严重性更高,发作更早,头晕,恶心和呕吐的持续时间更长。 4两种治疗后,脉搏,血压和呼吸频率均出现小幅但显着的下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号