首页> 外文OA文献 >Cost-effectiveness of fine needle biopsy of the breast.
【2h】

Cost-effectiveness of fine needle biopsy of the breast.

机译:乳房细针穿刺活检的成本效益。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the breast has been shown to be a safe and accurate technique, many surgeons question whether it is reliable enough to replace excisional biopsy. If FNA biopsy is followed by excisional biopsy for confirmation, it would seem that the cost of diagnostic work-up would be increased. In this study, however, the authors show that the major economic benefit of FNA biopsy is not that it replaces excisional biopsy, but that it allows the surgeon to triage which patients should have a 1-stage inpatient procedure with frozen section and which patients should have an excisional biopsy as an outpatient under local anesthesia. Over the past 2 years, the average cost at the East Carolina University School of Medicine of excisional outpatient biopsy (negative) was +702 +/- 348; inpatient biopsy (negative) was +1410 +/- 262; inpatient 1-stage procedure (positive) was +4135 +/- 361; and outpatient biopsy (positive) followed by inpatient procedure was +4822 +/- 586. The authors' last 100 FNA biopsies were read as 23 positive, three suspicious, 65 negative, and nine insufficient. There were no false-positives and four false-negatives, for a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 96%. Using the above figures, it is possible to calculate the cost per case if all 100 cases had been biopsied by the 1-stage inpatient technique (+2227), by the 2-stage outpatient method (+1938), or guided by the FNA biopsy where positive and suspicious readings are followed by an inpatient 1-stage procedure and negative and insufficient readings followed by an outpatient 2-stage procedure (+1759). Since the FNA biopsy costs +75, it resulted in a savings per case of +393 over routine inpatient biopsy and +104 per case over routine outpatient biopsy. Computer analysis revealed that the FNA biopsy would still be economically favorable if the sensitivity of the test fell as low as 37%, the specificity as low as 80%, or if the percentage of cases of cancer in the population biopsied fell as low as 13%. Since FNA biopsy is cost effective even when followed by an excisional or frozen section biopsy for confirmation, it would be safe and reasonable to expand its use to smaller hospitals where the personnel may be initially less experienced with the technique.
机译:尽管已证明对乳房进行细针穿刺(FNA)活检是一种安全,准确的技术,但许多外科医生仍怀疑它是否足以替代切除活检。如果在进行FNA活检后再进行切除活检以进行确认,则似乎诊断检查的成本将会增加。然而,在这项研究中,作者表明,FNA活检的主要经济效益不是用它代替切除活检,而是使外科医生能够分流哪些患者应进行1期冰冻切片住院治疗,哪些患者应进行冰冻切片住院治疗。在局部麻醉下作为门诊病人进行切除活检。在过去的2年中,东卡罗来纳大学医学院的门诊活检(阴性)平均费用为+702 +/- 348;住院活检(阴性)为+1410 +/- 262;住院一阶段手术(阳性)为+4135 +/- 361;门诊活检(阳性)+住院程序为+4822 +/-586。作者最近进行的100例FNA活检结果为23阳性,3可疑,65阴性和9不足。没有假阳性和四个假阴性,灵敏度为87%,特异性为100%,准确度为96%。使用以上数据,可以通过一阶段住院技术(+2227),二阶段门诊方法(+1938)或在FNA的指导下对所有100例病例进行活检来计算每例成本活组织检查,阳性和可疑读数后为住院一阶段检查,阴性和不足读数后为门诊二阶段检查(+1759)。由于FNA活检的费用为+75,因此与常规住院活检相比,每例节省了+393,而与常规住院活检相比,每例节省了+104。计算机分析表明,如果检测的灵敏度低至37%,特异性低至80%,或者在活检人群中癌症病例所占比例低至13,FNA活检在经济上仍将是有利的。 %。由于FNA活检即使在进行切除或冷冻切片活检以进行确认后仍具有成本效益,因此将其应用扩展到规模较小的医院是安全合理的,这些人员最初可能对该技术缺乏经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号