首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of antigen detection and antibody detection tests for Trypanosoma evansi infections of buffaloes in Indonesia.
【2h】

Evaluation of antigen detection and antibody detection tests for Trypanosoma evansi infections of buffaloes in Indonesia.

机译:印尼水牛伊氏锥虫感染的抗原检测和抗体检测测试评估。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two Ag-ELISAs, an IgG-specific antibody detection ELISA (IgG ELISA) and a card agglutination test (CATT) for the detection of Trypanasoma evansi infections in buffaloes in Indonesia, were compared. Diagnostic sensitivity estimates were obtained by testing sera from 139 Indonesian buffaloes which had been found to be infected by parasitological tests. Diagnostic specificity was estimated by testing sera from 263 buffaloes living in Australia. Response-operating characteristic curves were constructed, and optimal ELISA cut-off values, which minimized the number of false-negative and false-positive results, were chosen. The IgG ELISA had the highest sensitivity (89%) and the CATT had the highest specificity (100%). There was a significant difference between the sensitivities (71 and 81%), but not between the specificities (75 and 78%), of the two Ag-ELISAs. The four tests were further compared by calculation of post-test probabilities of infection for positive and negative test results using a range of prevalence values, and likelihood ratios. The results suggested that the CATT was the best test to 'rule-in' infection (i.e. the highest probability of infection in test-positive animals) and the IgG ELISA was the best test to 'rule-out' infection (i.e. the lowest probability of infection in test-negative animals).
机译:比较了两种Ag-ELISA,分别是IgG特异性抗体检测ELISA(IgG ELISA)和卡凝集试验(CATT),用于检测印度尼西亚水牛的伊万氏锥虫感染。诊断敏感性估计值是通过检测139头印度尼西亚水牛的血清而获得的,这些水牛已被寄生虫学测试所感染。通过检测居住在澳大利亚的263只水牛的血清来评估诊断特异性。构建响应操作特征曲线,并选择最佳的ELISA临界值,该值将假阴性和假阳性结果的数量降至最低。 IgG ELISA的灵敏度最高(89%),CATT的特异性最高(100%)。两种Ag-ELISA的灵敏度之间存在显着差异(71%和81%),但特异性之间没有显着差异(75%和78%)。通过使用一系列患病率值和似然比来计算阳性和阴性测试结果的测试后感染概率,进一步比较这四个测试。结果表明,CATT是“排除”感染的最佳检测方法(即阳性检测动物中最高的感染可能性),IgG ELISA是“排除”感染的最佳检测方法(即最低可能性)。测试阴性动物的感染率)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号