首页> 外文OA文献 >Spatial Selective Auditory Attention in the Presence of Reverberant Energy: Individual Differences in Normal-Hearing Listeners
【2h】

Spatial Selective Auditory Attention in the Presence of Reverberant Energy: Individual Differences in Normal-Hearing Listeners

机译:混响能量存在下的空间选择性听觉注意:正常听众中的个体差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Listeners can selectively attend to a desired target by directing attention to known target source features, such as location or pitch. Reverberation, however, reduces the reliability of the cues that allow a target source to be segregated and selected from a sound mixture. Given this, it is likely that reverberant energy interferes with selective auditory attention. Anecdotal reports suggest that the ability to focus spatial auditory attention degrades even with early aging, yet there is little evidence that middle-aged listeners have behavioral deficits on tasks requiring selective auditory attention. The current study was designed to look for individual differences in selective attention ability and to see if any such differences correlate with age. Normal-hearing adults, ranging in age from 18 to 55 years, were asked to report a stream of digits located directly ahead in a simulated rectangular room. Simultaneous, competing masker digit streams were simulated at locations 15° left and right of center. The level of reverberation was varied to alter task difficulty by interfering with localization cues (increasing localization blur). Overall, performance was best in the anechoic condition and worst in the high-reverberation condition. Listeners nearly always reported a digit from one of the three competing streams, showing that reverberation did not render the digits unintelligible. Importantly, inter-subject differences were extremely large. These differences, however, were not significantly correlated with age, memory span, or hearing status. These results show that listeners with audiometrically normal pure tone thresholds differ in their ability to selectively attend to a desired source, a task important in everyday communication. Further work is necessary to determine if these differences arise from differences in peripheral auditory function or in more central function.
机译:听众可以通过将注意力转移到已知的目标源特征(例如位置或音高)上,来有选择地关注目标。但是,混响降低了提示的可靠性,提示使目标源可以从混音中分离和选择。鉴于此,混响能量很可能会干扰选择性的听觉注意。传闻表明,即使早期衰老,聚焦空间听觉注意力的能力也会下降,但是几乎没有证据表明中年听众在需要选择性听觉注意力的任务上存在行为缺陷。当前的研究旨在寻找选择性注意能力方面的个体差异,并查看是否这些差异与年龄有关。年龄在18至55岁之间的听力正常的成年人被要求报告位于模拟矩形房间正前方的数字流。同时在中心左右15°位置模拟竞争的掩蔽数字流。通过干扰定位提示(增加定位模糊)来改变混响水平,以改变任务难度。总体而言,在消声条件下性能最佳,而在高混响条件下性能则最差。听众几乎总是报告三个竞争流之一中的一个数字,这表明混响不会使这些数字难以理解。重要的是,受试者之间的差异非常大。但是,这些差异与年龄,记忆力或听觉状态没有显着相关。这些结果表明,具有听觉上正常的纯音阈值的听众在选择听取所需音源方面的能力有所不同,这在日常交流中很重要。有必要做进一步的工作来确定这些差异是由于外周听觉功能的差异还是中央功能的差异引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号