首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing the effectiveness of evidence-based parenting programmes on families with and without children with special educational needs; short term and longer term gains
【2h】

Comparing the effectiveness of evidence-based parenting programmes on families with and without children with special educational needs; short term and longer term gains

机译:比较循证育儿方案对有或没有特殊教育需要儿童的家庭的有效性;短期和长期收益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Parents of children with a disability or special educational needs (SEN) have three available options when accessing parenting programmes: (a) to access a parenting programme that has been adapted for use by families with a child with disability, (b) to access a disability-specific parenting programme, or (c) to access a parenting programme developed for typically developing children. The aim of the present study was to examine whether accessing evidence-based parenting programmes (EBPPs) developed for typically developed children (option c) could benefit families of children with SEN, and whether benefits could be maintained when programme delivery takes place as part of sustained service implementation. Using data from an effectiveness trial, we found that there was no evidence of differential effectiveness: i.e., families of children with SEN experienced similar gains to families whose child did not have SEN with respect to child behaviour problems, parenting style and parental mental well-being. Using data from services’ sustained implementation, our findings indicated that gains during the implementation phase were of similar magnitude to gains during the research trial: following EBPPs, families of children with SEN experienced small to moderate improvements in behaviour problems and moderate to large improvements in parenting and parental mental well-being across the two phases. One year later, gains were significantly maintained in families who had accessed EBPPs as part of the research trial. While the study is not proposing that EBPPs developed for typically developing children are a replacement for disability-adapted or disability-specific parenting programmes, there was a pragmatic need to evaluate the effectiveness of EBPPs that are in practice accessed by families with a child with SEN. Overall, families of children with SEN can benefit from EBPPs similarly to families whose child does not have SEN, and the gains are significant and substantial even when EBPPs are offered as part of regular service provision. Longer-term maintenance of gains (one year) in service-led implementation of EBPPs likely requires more input.
机译:残疾或特殊教育需求的儿童的父母在访问育儿计划时有三个可用的选项:(a)访问适合残障儿童家庭使用的育儿计划,(b)访问特定于残疾的育儿计划,或(c)访问为通常发育的儿童制定的育儿计划。本研究的目的是检验获得为典型的发达儿童开发的循证育儿计划(EBPP)是否可以使有特殊教育需要的儿童的家庭受益,以及在实施该计划的一部分时是否可以保持利益持续服务实施。使用有效性试验的数据,我们发现没有证据表明有效性存在差异:即,在儿童行为问题,养育方式和父母心理健康方面,有特殊教育需要的孩子的家庭与那些没有特殊教育需要的孩子的家庭获得了相似的收益,存在。使用服务持续实施的数据,我们的发现表明,实施阶段的收益与研究试验期间的收益具有相似的程度:在进行EBPP之后,SEN的儿童家庭在行为问题上经历了中度到中度的改善,而在行为方面则有了中度到较大的改善。这两个阶段的育儿和父母心理健康。一年后,作为研究试验的一部分,使用EBPP的家庭获得了显着的收益。尽管该研究并未提出为通常发育中的儿童开发的EBPP替代了适应残疾或针对特定残疾的育儿计划,但务实地需要评估具有SEN的儿童家庭在实践中所采用的EBPP的有效性。总体而言,有特殊教育需要的孩子的家庭可以像无子女的家庭一样从EBPP中受益,并且即使将EBPP作为常规服务的一部分提供,收益也非常可观。以服务为主导的EBPP实施中的收益长期保持(一年)可能需要更多的投入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号