首页> 外文OA文献 >A critical review of interventions to increase compliance with medication-taking, obtaining medication refills, and appointment-keeping in the treatment of cardiovascular disease
【2h】

A critical review of interventions to increase compliance with medication-taking, obtaining medication refills, and appointment-keeping in the treatment of cardiovascular disease

机译:对旨在提高对心血管疾病的服药依从性,获得药物补充剂和预约治疗的干预措施的严格审查

摘要

Background. The aim of this study was to critically review the literature regarding interventions to improve cardiovascular patientsu27 compliance with medication-taking, obtaining medication refills, or appointment keeping. Methods. The search for relevant randomized trials involved searching the Medline, Healthplan, and Psychlit databases from 1985 to 1996; searching the bibliographies of located studies; contacting Austral ian government departments, nongovernment organizations, and pharmaceutical companies; and ultimate review of the resulting list by two field experts. The 33 located trials were critically appraised and classified as being of good, fair, or poor methodological quality. Descriptive and effectiveness data were then extracted from the 20 good and fair quality trials. Interrater reliability was high on the 20% of references double-coded. Results. The 20 studies reviewed evaluated the effectiveness of 18 intervention strategies. Tentative recommendations were made for many patient-focused and structural strategies across all three target behaviors. Physician-focused strategies, tested only for appointment keeping, were all tentatively recommended against. Conclusions. The methodological quality of many of the located trials was less than optimal, prohibiting strong recommendations. Therefore, further good-quality, randomized trials are necessary in order to clarify the effectiveness of those strategies identified as potentially useful in this review.
机译:背景。这项研究的目的是严格审查有关干预措施的文献,以改善心血管患者的服药,获得药物补充剂或保持约会的依从性。方法。寻找相关随机试验的过程包括搜索1985年至1996年的Medline,Healthplan和Psychlit数据库;搜索定位研究的书目;与澳大利亚政府部门,非政府组织和制药公司联系;并由两名现场专家对最终清单进行最终审查。对该33项定位试验进行了严格评估,并将其归类为方法学质量良好,公平或较差。然后从20个优质和公平的试验中提取描述性和有效性数据。在20%的双编码参考文献中,interrater可靠性很高。结果。回顾的20项研究评估了18种干预策略的有效性。针对所有这三种目标行为的许多以患者为中心的结构性策略,提出了初步建议。暂时建议不要以医师为中心的策略,仅对约会进行测试。结论。许多定位试验的方法学质量均未达到理想水平,因此无法提出强有力的建议。因此,有必要进行进一步的高质量随机试验,以阐明那些被认为对本次评估有用的策略的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号