首页> 外文OA文献 >A STUDY ON ECONOMIC SANCTIONS: STRATEGY FOR THE NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR AND HUMAN RIGHTS CRISES-INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE-
【2h】

A STUDY ON ECONOMIC SANCTIONS: STRATEGY FOR THE NORTH KOREAN NUCLEAR AND HUMAN RIGHTS CRISES-INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE-

机译:经济制裁研究:北朝鲜核危机和人权危机的策略-国际法的视角-

摘要

North Korea has been criticized not only for manufacturing weapons of mass destruction but also for denying its people the most basic rights. In response to the North Korean crises, there have been two different approaches: economic sanctions or engagement. This study is to analyze whether and how the international community could change the North Korean behavior effectively under international norms. The U.N. Charter expressly contemplates that economic sanctions may be imposed in order to maintain or restore international peace and security. Sanctions under the United Nations can be imposed when there is a threat of or breach of the peace. If the Council determines gross violations of human rights as a threat to peace, it can play a pivotal role in protecting. Humanitarian causes limit the scope and types of economic sanctions. Economic sanctions are limited by humanitarian causes. Further, comprehensive economic sanctions are not effective. North Korea has an extremely authoritarian political structure and it would make economic sanctions less effective. Sanctions might contribute directly to the economic hardship of North Koreans. There is no hope that sanctions may strengthen NGOs, opposition groups or movements in North Korea. The elite and the military do not suffer while the rest of the population starves. On the other hand, economic engagement would strengthen reformer groups within the North Korean government, empower entrepreneurs, produce a middle class and interest groups, and eventually stimulate some form of civil society. Engagement with North Korea will weaken the regime?s authority to control the people. It would directly secure the right to food. Engagement expands the international community's alternatives. Engagement with North Korea should be encouraged. North Korea finds that the only way to ensure its security is to change its relationship with the U.S. from hostility to reconciliation. An effective international strategy to force North Korea to respect international norms is to fully engage the country. A package deal with North Korea can be considered.
机译:朝鲜不仅因制造大规模毁灭性武器而受到批评,而且因剥夺其人民的最基本权利而受到批评。为应对朝鲜危机,采取了两种不同的方法:经济制裁或参与。这项研究旨在分析国际社会在国际规范下是否以及如何有效改变朝鲜的行为。 《联合国宪章》明确地考虑到可以实行经济制裁,以维持或恢复国际和平与安全。当威胁或破坏和平时,可以实施联合国的制裁。如果安理会将严重侵犯人权定为对和平的威胁,它将在保护方面发挥关键作用。人道主义原因限制了经济制裁的范围和类型。经济制裁受到人道主义原因的限制。此外,全面的经济制裁是无效的。朝鲜具有极端的威权政治结构,这将使经济制裁的效力降低。制裁可能直接导致朝鲜人的经济困难。制裁没有希望加强北朝鲜的非政府组织,反对派团体或运动。其余人口挨饿时,精英和军队不会受苦。另一方面,经济参与将加强北朝鲜政府内部的改革者团体,赋予企业家权力,培养中产阶级和利益集团,并最终刺激某种形式的公民社会。与朝鲜的接触将削弱该政权控制人民的权力。这将直接确保食物权。参与扩大了国际社会的选择范围。应鼓励与朝鲜接触。朝鲜发现,确保其安全的唯一方法是将与美国的关系从敌对转变为和解。迫使朝鲜尊重国际准则的有效国际战略是使朝鲜充分参与。可以考虑与朝鲜达成一揽子交易。

著录项

  • 作者

    Oh Seung Jin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号